The potential impact of HJR1089 on state laws is substantial. By convening a Constitutional Convention, the resolution allows for a comprehensive review and revision of the Oklahoma Constitution, which has not been subjected to such a thorough reevaluation since the last proposal submitted in 1970. This could lead to significant amendments affecting various aspects of governance, rights, and functions covered by the state Constitution. Moreover, it establishes a framework for a transparent process where public input can be solicited through a Constitutional Convention Commission, which is tasked with conducting hearings prior to the delegate selection process.
Summary
HJR1089 is a joint resolution that calls for a Constitutional Convention in Oklahoma, set to commence on January 5, 2027, and conclude by May 28, 2028. The main purpose of this Convention is to alter, revise, or propose a completely new state Constitution. The resolution stipulates that the Convention must consist of 149 delegates, all of whom will be members of the Oklahoma State Legislature. Importantly, any changes proposed by the Convention will be subject to voter approval at the General Election in November 2028. This process aims to provide a structured approach to revising the state's foundational legal document and to ensure that such significant changes have the backing of the electorate.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding HJR1089 is mixed, revealing underlying tensions regarding governance and state authority. Supporters view the resolution as a necessary step towards modernizing the state's legal framework and believe it could address long-standing issues in Oklahoma governance. Conversely, skeptics raise concerns about the implications of allowing a Convention to potentially propose extensive changes to the Constitution. There are fears that such changes could undermine established protections or lead to a power grab by certain ideological factions within the legislature.
Contention
Notable points of contention include the appointment and removal of delegates who may violate their oaths, as stipulated in the resolution. Critics argue that this power could be abused, potentially leading to political maneuvering during the Convention. Additionally, the requirement for a two-thirds majority to amend existing articles of the Constitution could stifle necessary reforms, compounding the frustrations of those hoping for swift, meaningful change. Ultimately, HJR1089 illustrates the complex interplay of state legislative processes and public sentiment regarding constitutional governance.
Proposes temporary constitutional amendment allowing State constitutional convention convened to reform system of property taxation to propose statutory changes.
Proposes temporary constitutional amendment allowing State constitutional convention convened to reform system of property taxation to propose statutory changes.
(Constitutional Amendment) Provides for the election of constitutional convention delegates and vote requirements necessary for the adoption of a new constitution (RR SEE FISC NOTE GF EX)
(Constitutional Amendment) Modifies disposition of certain state revenues through repeal of the Revenue Stabilization Trust Fund and deposits of certain revenue streams into the Budget Stabilization Fund (RRF INCREASE GF RV See Note)
(Constitutional Amendment) Provides relative to the application of state monies to the unfunded accrued liability of the Teachers' Retirement System of La. (EN DECREASE SD RV See Note)
Proposing An Amendment To Article Xvii, Section 3 Of The Hawaii Constitution To Specify That The Standard For Voter Approval Of A Constitutional Amendment Proposed By The Legislature Is A Majority Of All The Votes Tallied Upon The Question.