Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Oklahoma House Bill HB2287

Introduced
2/3/25  
Refer
2/4/25  
Refer
2/4/25  
Report Pass
2/25/25  
Engrossed
3/12/25  
Refer
4/1/25  
Report Pass
4/15/25  
Enrolled
5/7/25  

Caption

Education; per-pupil expenditure definition; effective date; emergency.

Impact

If enacted, HB2287 will substantially impact state laws regarding educational funding, potentially leading to increased per-student funding designs that could benefit a variety of school programs. The bill mandates that the State Department of Education not only provide aggregate expenditure figures but also detailed reports on each category of expenditure. Consequently, this could foster a greater understanding of how funds are allocated, thus aiding in policy adjustments that address the needs of different school districts in Oklahoma.

Summary

House Bill 2287 is a legislative proposal aimed at amending the definition of 'per-pupil expenditure' under Oklahoma law. The bill seeks to expand the existing definition to include a broader range of current expenditures incurred by school districts. By revising this definition, HB2287 aims to provide a more accurate reflection of the financial resources allocated for the education of each student, encompassing various categories such as instructional services, administrative support, and student services. This updated approach is intended to enhance transparency and accountability in educational funding.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding HB2287 appears to be positive, especially among educators and administrators who believe that a more comprehensive definition will facilitate better resource management and support for student learning. Proponents of the bill argue that it is a necessary step toward more equitable funding distribution across districts, addressing disparities that have existed under previous frameworks. However, some critics may voice concerns regarding the implementation of these changes and the potential for increased administrative complexity involved in reporting expenditures comprehensively.

Contention

Despite its favorable outlook, the passage of HB2287 may not be without contention. Opponents could argue that expanding the expenditure categories may complicate budgeting and funding processes, potentially leading to discrepancies in how funds are interpreted and utilized. Additionally, there may be apprehension about how the changes could affect the prioritization of funding across various educational programs and initiatives. The debate will likely center around balancing the intent of improved funding transparency with practical implications for school administration.

Companion Bills

OK HB2287

Carry Over Education; per-pupil expenditure definition; effective date; emergency.

Previously Filed As

OK HB2287

Education; per-pupil expenditure definition; effective date; emergency.

OK HB1280

Schools; instructional expenditures; requirement; procedures; definitions; effective date; emergency.

OK SB1051

Campaign expenditures; creating the Campaign Expenditure Transparency Act. Effective date. Emergency.

OK HB1754

Schools; school personnel; definitions; effective date.

OK SB140

Mathematics instruction; directing expenditure of certain funds; creating the Oklahoma Math Achievement and Proficiency Act. Effective date. Emergency.

OK SB374

Schools; directing the Commission for Educational Quality and Accountability to make certain school accreditation determinations until certain date. Effective date. Emergency.

OK HB1013

Education; State Board of Education; revocation and suspension of licenses and certificates; effective date; emergency.

OK HB2018

Schools; definitions; granting physical and occupational therapists certified teacher benefits; effective date; emergency.

OK SB1117

Income tax; modifying definition of qualified project for economic development and infrastructure expenditures credit. Effective date.

OK SB797

State Board of Education; authorizing certain action; requiring notice. Effective date. Emergency.

Similar Bills

CA SB321

Late signature curing expenditure reports.

CA SB1349

Taxation: tax expenditures: Legislative Analyst’s Office: assessment, report, and recommendation.

AR HB1043

To Require Disclosure And Reporting Of Noncandidate Expenditures Pertaining To Appellate Judicial Elections; And To Adopt New Laws Concerning Appellate Judicial Campaigns.

MN SF45

Certain requirements modification for the Tax expenditure Review Commission

AZ SB1408

Campaign finance; public service corporations

CA AB530

California State University: fiscal transparency.

MN HF1106

Tax Expenditure Review Commission requirements modified, and legislative requirements for new or renewed tax expenditures repealed.

OH HB250

Enact the Ohio Anti-Corruption Act