Relates to reviewability of final decisions made by the public employment relations board, and enforceability thereof.
Impact
This bill is significant as it aims to streamline the judicial review process by solidifying the timeline and jurisdiction where appeals can be processed. By enforcing that appeals must be made in Albany County, this bill limits the venues available for such disputes, potentially impacting the accessibility for certain parties. On one hand, the proponents argue this will create a more efficient review system that benefits timely resolutions. However, critics may contend that this centralization could hinder access for some stakeholders who may face difficulties in reaching Albany.
Summary
Bill A11191 seeks to amend the labor law concerning the reviewability of final decisions made by the Public Employment Relations Board (PERB). The legislation aims to clarify the processes through which an aggrieved party can appeal the board's decisions, particularly in unfair labor practice cases. The bill outlines that these reviews must be initiated in the supreme court of Albany County, establishing a specific timeframe of either 30 days for unfair labor practice decisions or 10 days for certification proceedings following the service of the order via electronic mail or certified mail.
Contention
Notable points of contention surrounding A11191 include whether the bill adequately protects the rights of individuals who may seek to contest decisions made by the PERB. Advocates for labor rights may express concern that the bill could create barriers to justice by consolidating the review power and limiting where complaints can be filed. Furthermore, there is a potential debate on the balance between expediting the judicial processes versus ensuring fair access to legal recourse for those affected by the decisions of the board. As these discussions unfold, various stakeholders' perspectives will ultimately influence the bill's trajectory through the legislative process.
Prohibits the use of automated systems to make employment decisions unless there is a meaningful human review of the output of such automated system prior to the final employment decision; requires employers that use an automated system in the hiring process to notify applicants of the use of such system; provides that an applicant who has received an adverse employment decision may request a human-conducted review of such decision.
Requires the workers' compensation board to submit a supplemental report every year, including recommendations to modernize such board and certain data regarding claims made and decisions rendered on such claims.
Requires the workers' compensation board to submit a supplemental report every year, including recommendations to modernize such board and certain data regarding claims made and decisions rendered on such claims.
Restricts the use by an employer or an employment agency of electronic monitoring or an automated employment decision tool to screen a candidate or employee for an employment decision unless such tool has been the subject of an impact assessment within the last year; requires notice to employment candidates of the use of such tools; provides remedies for violations.
Restricts the use by an employer or an employment agency of electronic monitoring or an automated employment decision tool to screen a candidate or employee for an employment decision unless such tool has been the subject of an impact assessment within the last year; requires notice to employment candidates of the use of such tools; provides remedies for violations.
Relating to a prohibition of employment discrimination on the basis of reproductive decisions and certain employment agreements limiting reproductive decisions.
Relating to a prohibition of employment discrimination on the basis of reproductive decisions and certain employment agreements limiting reproductive decisions.