New York Assembly Bill A10138

New York 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/5/26
• Refer: 2/5/26

Caption

Relates to the management of PFAS in biosolids in the state by requiring testing and reporting of certain groundwater, biosolids, and soil and establishing a moratorium on the sale and use of biosolids; establishes the PFAS agricultural response program and fund to assist farms found to have levels of PFAS contamination which exceed regulatory standards.

Impact

If enacted, A10138 will create a comprehensive framework for the monitoring of PFAS in agricultural settings. This includes mandatory quarterly testing of biosolids for PFAS contaminants and the establishment of a public database to track these findings. By requiring transparency in testing results and public access to information, the bill aims to empower communities with knowledge about potential hazards. Additionally, it introduces the PFAS agricultural response program which will provide assistance to farmers dealing with contaminated lands, potentially including financial support and grants for remediation efforts.

Summary

Bill A10138 aims to address the management of perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in biosolids within the state of New York. This legislation seeks to amend the environmental conservation law by introducing new protocols for testing and reporting on the presence of PFAS in biosolids, soil, and water. A significant aspect of this bill is the establishment of a five-year moratorium on the sale and use of biosolids that contain PFAS, thereby reducing potential exposure for agricultural land and its products. This legislation highlights the state’s increasing concern over environmental contaminants and public health.

Contention

Debate surrounding A10138 has focused on the implications of the moratorium and the economic impact on farmers reliant on biosolid applications for fertilization. Some stakeholders argue that the strict regulations could lead to increased operational costs and burdens for agricultural producers. Conversely, proponents emphasize the need to prioritize public health and environmental safety over short-term agricultural practices that could pose long-term risks. The bill reflects a balancing act between advancing agricultural productivity and safeguarding the environment against chemical contamination.