New York Assembly Bill A09635

New York 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/21/26
• Refer: 1/21/26

Caption

Restricts the use of prediction markets and/or mobile sports wagering platforms by officers or employees of a state agency, members of the legislature or legislative employees when using information acquired by such public officer in the course of their official duties.

Impact

If enacted, A09635 would establish clearer boundaries regarding the use of sensitive information by public officers, thereby reinforcing the integrity of state governance. The bill aims to prevent situations where public officials might use privileged information to place bets that could be influenced by their actions or decisions in office. This is particularly relevant given the rise of digital platforms for gambling, which have made it easier for individuals to engage in betting activities.

Summary

Bill A09635 seeks to amend the Public Officers Law to prohibit certain public officers, including members of the legislature and state agency employees, from participating in prediction markets or mobile sports wagering platforms using information acquired in their official capacity. The intent of this bill is to enhance the ethical standards governing public officials and ensure that they do not exploit their access to confidential information for personal financial gain. This change reflects a growing concern over the potential for conflicts of interest among public servants, especially as gambling becomes more prevalent and accessible.

Contention

While the bill has received support for promoting ethical governance, it could face opposition from legislators who argue that it may limit the rights of public officials to participate in recreational betting. Critics may contend that the ban is overly broad and could extend to activities that do not necessarily involve a direct conflict of interest. Additionally, discussions in committee sessions may highlight concerns about the effectiveness of such restrictions in curbing unethical behavior, prompting debates on whether alternative measures could achieve the same objectives without imposing such restrictions.