New York Assembly Bill A09487

New York 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/7/26
• Refer: 1/7/26
• Report Pass: 1/21/26
• Refer: 1/21/26

Caption

Provides for the use of automated employment decision-making tools and artificial intelligence systems by a county, city, town, village, school district, board of cooperative educational services, county vocational education and extension board, district corporation, the state university of New York, the city university of New York, or community college; amends the effectiveness thereof.

Impact

The bill lays out clear stipulations that the implementation of artificial intelligence systems must not alter existing rights and benefits of employees, nor should it impede their representation in labor organizations. This regulatory approach aims to prevent any unintended consequences of automation that could jeopardize job security, particularly in public sectors where collective agreements are prevalent. The proposed measures have significant implications for labor relations, ensuring that any integration of technology respects the established rights of workers while guiding governmental agencies on the ethical application of AI in employment decisions.

Summary

A09487 is a legislative bill introduced in the New York Assembly aimed at regulating the use of automated employment decision-making tools and artificial intelligence systems by various governmental entities, including counties, cities, towns, school districts, and state educational institutions. The bill seeks to amend existing laws and provide a framework for how these technologies can be utilized while safeguarding employees' rights. It emphasizes the protection of existing collective bargaining agreements and employee relationships with organizations, ensuring that automation does not lead to job displacement or reduced employment benefits.

Contention

While the bill is designed to safeguard employee interests, discussions around its implications indicate potential contention. Advocates for AI integration in the workforce argue that the bill may stifle innovation and modernization efforts within public sector operations. Critics, however, emphasize that without such protections, employees could face adverse consequences such as job loss or harmful changes to their current employment conditions. The ongoing debate centers on finding the right balance between leveraging technology for efficiency and ensuring fair labor practices and protections.