New York Assembly Bill A09347

New York 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 12/10/25
• Refer: 12/10/25
• Refer: 1/7/26

Caption

Prohibits organized militias from another state, territory, or district from entering into New York for the purpose of doing military duty without the express permission of the governor unless such militia has been called into federal service and is acting under authority of the president of the United States.

Impact

If enacted, this bill would alter the legal framework concerning how militias operate within New York State. It clarifies the authority of the governor in controlling and regulating external military influences, thus promoting a clearer chain of command regarding the entrance of militias. This change may influence future operational guidelines for militias and potentially limit the activities of groups looking to conduct military operations within state borders without prior approval. Additionally, it empowers the attorney general to take civil action against any violations of this provision.

Summary

Bill A09347 seeks to amend New York's military law by prohibiting organized militias from entering the state for military duty without the explicit permission of the governor. This legislative change is primarily aimed at asserting state control over military activities and ensuring that any militia actions align with both state and federal guidelines. The bill establishes that only militias called into federal service by the president of the United States would be exempt from this requirement, thereby reinforcing a distinction between state-regulated militias and those operating under federal authority.

Contention

Some points of contention surrounding Bill A09347 may include debates over state versus federal authority and the implications for civil liberties. Proponents may argue that the bill is a necessary measure to prevent unauthorized military actions within the state, thereby safeguarding public order and state sovereignty. Conversely, opponents might express concerns about the potential for overreach by the state government in regulating militias, arguing that it could hinder lawful assemblies or organizations operating under constitutional rights. As discussions advance, balancing security needs with individual rights will likely be a focal point of debate.