New York Assembly Bill A09283

New York 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 11/21/25
• Refer: 11/21/25
• Refer: 1/7/26

Caption

Establishes the "Supporting Families Together act"; repeals certain provisions of law relating to civil and criminal penalties for mandated reporters.

Impact

The impact of A09283 is expected to be far-reaching, particularly in how it influences the reporting dynamics within social services. By alleviating the threat of penalties for mandated reporters, the bill aims to encourage more individuals to come forward with reports of suspected abuse or neglect without fear of facing legal repercussions. This could lead to a more robust system of child protection by ensuring that reports are made more freely, potentially allowing more cases of abuse or neglect to be investigated. However, the change also raises questions regarding accountability for mandated reporters and the implications of reducing the deterrent effects of penalties, which might be necessary in some situations.

Summary

Bill A09283, known as the 'Supporting Families Together Act', proposes significant amendments to the state's social services law, specifically targeting the penalties associated with mandated reporters. By repealing certain provisions, the bill aims to remove both civil and criminal penalties imposed on individuals who are mandated to report suspected cases of abuse or neglect. This legislative change reflects a growing recognition of the need to protect and support families, particularly those who may be involved in the social services system. The act emphasizes a more supportive approach towards families in difficult situations rather than one that is punitive towards mandated reporters who may hesitate to report due to fear of penalties.

Contention

Debates around A09283 have surfaced issues regarding the balance between protecting families and holding individuals accountable within the system. Advocates for the bill argue that the focus should be on providing support to families rather than punishing individuals who may be trying to act in a child's best interests. On the other hand, critics are concerned that removing penalties could lead to an increase in false reports or an atmosphere where the seriousness of mandatory reporting is undermined. This division reflects broader tensions in the approach to child protection and the reliance on mandated reporters to act appropriately in complex situations.