New York Assembly Bill A09243

New York 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 11/7/25
• Refer: 11/7/25
• Refer: 1/7/26

Caption

Increases the mandatory surcharge and the crime victim's assistance fee which is levied upon any person convicted of a crime or violation in this state; creates a crime victim's lien which allows such recovery against a convicted offender in the amount of the unpaid portion of the mandatory surcharge or the crime victim's assistance fee; creates a crime victim's assistance account.

Impact

With the introduction of this bill, the penalties levied on convicted offenders, especially those convicted of felonies and sexual offenses, would see substantial increases. For instance, the crime victim assistance fee for felons is proposed to rise from $25 to $500 and for homicide offenders it will be $2,500 monthly. These changes aim to provide local and state entities with more extensive resources to support victims of crime. The bill's provisions also dictate that if a victim's assistance fee is unpaid, a state's lien may be placed against the offender, allowing for further legal action to secure the payment.

Summary

The bill A09243 proposes significant changes to the way crime victim assistance is funded in New York State. It focuses on increasing the mandatory surcharge and the crime victim's assistance fee applied to individuals convicted of crimes. The additional revenues generated from these changes are intended to be allocated into a newly established crime victim's assistance account, which would be used to provide support and services for crime victims. This account is designed to ensure that victims receive timely assistance and compensation for their losses.

Contention

While proponents argue that these adjustments will significantly enhance victim support services, opponents express concerns regarding the financial burden placed on individuals convicted of crimes, potentially complicating their reintegration into society. Critics argue that such financial penalties may disproportionately affect low-income offenders who might struggle to pay these increased fees, thus perpetuating cycles of poverty and marginalization. Additionally, there are questions about the enforcement processes for collecting these fees and liens, with concerns regarding the potential for unfair hardships on offenders.