New York Assembly Bill A09148

New York 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 10/17/25
• Refer: 10/17/25
• Refer: 1/7/26

Caption

Relates to the use of fluoroscopy by physician assistants.

Impact

The proposed legislation would specifically modify Section 3501 of the public health law, which governs the use of fluoroscopy and other radiological practices within the state. By permitting licensed physician assistants to engage in fluoroscopy, the bill potentially expands healthcare accessibility and service efficiency, particularly in settings where radiologists or physicians are not immediately available. This is likely to be beneficial in enhancing patient outcomes through timely interventions.

Summary

Bill A09148 aims to amend the public health law in New York by allowing licensed physician assistants to utilize fluoroscopy for diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. This new legislation is important as fluoroscopy enables real-time imaging, facilitating better guidance during medical interventions. The bill proposes to enhance the role of physician assistants in patient care, thereby addressing a growing need in healthcare for professionals who can perform more complex imaging tasks under specific educational and training requirements.

Conclusion

Ultimately, Bill A09148 reflects broader trends in the healthcare sector towards expanding the scope of practice for non-physician medical professionals. While supporters view this as a necessary step towards modernizing medical practice consistent with evolving healthcare demands, the implications of such changes will require careful consideration of training, accountability, and patient safety.

Contention

Notably, the bill does set forth that physician assistants must complete a designated educational program totaling at least eighty hours of training—forty hours each of didactic and clinical training. This provision might raise concerns among existing healthcare professionals regarding standards of care and the competencies of physician assistants. Critics may argue about potential risks involved in allowing non-physicians to perform procedures generally reserved for more extensively trained doctors.