New York Assembly Bill A07983

New York 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/16/25
• Refer: 4/16/25
• Refer: 1/7/26
• Report Pass: 2/25/26

Caption

Prohibits the purchase of ammunition if such purchaser failed a background check, is prohibited by federal law or is subject to a temporary or extreme risk protection order issued pursuant to article sixty-three-A of the civil practice law and rules.

Impact

If enacted, A07983 would amend Section 400.03 of the New York Penal Law, thereby reinforcing the state's efforts to regulate firearms and ammunition more effectively. The bill’s passage would align state laws with existing federal laws regarding firearm possession prohibitions, reinforcing safeguards meant to prevent access to firearms and ammunition by individuals deemed a danger to themselves or others. The immediate effect of the bill would be an increase in scrutiny during the ammunition purchasing process, which supporters argue is a necessary step in promoting public safety.

Summary

Bill A07983 seeks to enhance public safety by imposing restrictions on the purchase of ammunition for individuals who may pose a risk to themselves or others. Specifically, the bill prohibits the sale of ammunition to anyone who has failed a background check, is prohibited from possessing a shotgun or rifle under federal law, or is subject to a temporary or extreme risk protection order as defined by state law. This legislative initiative reflects a growing trend toward stricter gun control measures, particularly in response to increasing concerns over gun violence and gun-related incidents in various communities across New York State.

Contention

There may be notable points of contention surrounding A07983, particularly from individuals and organizations advocating for gun rights. Critics might argue that the bill places undue restrictions on law-abiding citizens who wish to purchase ammunition for legitimate purposes. Concerns about subjective interpretations of what constitutes a 'risk' could arise, especially regarding how individuals are placed on temporary or extreme risk protection orders, which could potentially lead to disputes over personal liberties and Second Amendment rights. As debates on gun control laws are often highly polarized, the discussion surrounding this bill is likely to reflect broader national conversations about gun rights and public safety.