New York Assembly Bill A02685

New York 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/22/25
• Refer: 1/22/25
• Refer: 1/7/26

Caption

Authorizes a holder of a license to perform limited-scope radiography to practice radiography at urgent care centers under the supervision of a licensed practitioner or licensed registered radiologic technologist; defines limited-scope radiographer as a person licensed to practice radiography limited to chest, extremities, skull/sinus, and spine/sacrum at urgent care centers; makes related provisions.

Impact

If enacted, the bill would have significant implications for public health regulations and the healthcare workforce in New York. It establishes a clear legal framework for limited-scope radiographers, including educational requirements and the type of practices permitted. This could enhance the availability of radiographic services in urgent care centers, addressing patient needs while regulated under strict oversight. The establishment of educational standards and licensure aims to ensure that practitioners are well-trained, therefore potentially improving the quality of care provided in urgent care settings.

Summary

The bill A02685 proposes amendments to public health law regarding limited-scope radiographers in New York. This legislation focuses on allowing licensed individuals to practice radiography specifically at urgent care centers under the supervision of licensed practitioners. The bill seeks to define the scope of practice for limited-scope radiographers, including specific body areas they may work with, like the chest, extremities, and spine, while also excluding fluoroscopy procedures, aiming for clarity and safety in practice areas. It aims to create a structured system for licensing and regulation that addresses the evolving healthcare landscape, particularly for urgent care settings.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding bill A02685 may arise from concerns about the scope of practice for limited-scope radiographers and the implications for existing radiologic technologists. Critics may argue that expanding the ability of less extensively trained individuals to perform radiographic services could pose risks to patient safety or dilute the quality of care. Supporters will likely highlight the necessity of such provisions to meet increasing healthcare demands in urgent care settings and the importance of supervision by qualified professionals. Balancing regulatory rigor with the expansion of radiographic services remains a central debate.