Revises provisions relating to civil liability to persons using certain premises for recreational activity under certain circumstances. (BDR 3-1021)
This bill, which can be cited as the Recreational Use of Land Statute, aims to encourage both the development of land for public recreational use and the maintenance of trails, parks, and natural areas. It offers immunity from liability for injuries that occur on certain public lands, trails, or parks, as long as these areas remain accessible to the public at no charge. With this legislation, the intent is to bolster recreational opportunities across Nevada while reducing the risk of lawsuits for property owners and public entities.
Senate Bill No. 303, introduced during the 83rd Session (2025), seeks to revise civil liability standards concerning individuals using certain premises for recreational activities. The bill is designed to promote safer engagement in outdoor activities by limiting the liability of landowners, specifically the State of Nevada, political subdivisions, and nonprofit entities. It delineates that owners and lessees of premises intended for recreational purposes owe no duty to ensure safety for users, nor are they responsible for any injuries incurred during recreational activities, provided these injuries happen in spaces designated for such use.
Overall, SB303 represents a significant change in Nevada's approach to land liability related to recreational activities. As the bill moves forward, discussions about balancing landowner protections with public safety standards will likely continue, particularly as community feedback and legislative assessments of its impact on public usage of recreational spaces unfold.
While the bill has garnered support for promoting recreational activities and reducing litigation fears among landowners, there are pressing concerns regarding its implications on safety and accountability. Opponents may argue that the lack of liability could lead to negligence regarding the maintenance of parks and recreational areas, potentially jeopardizing public safety. Critics also express worries that citizens engaging in recreational activities might face greater risks if landowners are not held to any safety standards.