New Jersey 2026-2027 Regular Session

New Jersey Senate Bill S152

Introduced
1/13/26  

Caption

Requires certain employers with State contracts to pay their employees their usual compensation for each day of jury service.

Impact

If enacted, S152 would amend the existing law, specifically N.J.S.2B:20-17, which currently prohibits employers from penalizing employees for attending jury service. The bill's enforcement would primarily affect employers that meet certain criteria, specifically those with state contracts and a workforce of at least 50 employees over a certain timeframe. This change is projected to enhance employee rights, ensuring that no financial penalty is incurred when fulfilling civic duties, thereby promoting participation in the jury process.

Summary

Senate Bill S152 is proposed legislation aimed at strengthening the employment protections for individuals summoned for jury service in New Jersey. The bill mandates that employers who have contracts with the state are required to continue paying their employees their usual compensation during the time they are serving on a jury. This compensation is to be reduced only by the amount of any per diem fees received for attending jury service. By doing so, the bill seeks to alleviate the financial burden on employees who may otherwise face a loss of income during their jury duty period.

Contention

The introduction of S152 reflects a supportive trend toward enhancing employment protections for jury service. While some may praise the bill for fostering civic responsibility without financial reprisal, potential areas of contention could arise from employers about the cost implications of mandated compensation. Employers may voice concerns over the additional financial burdens imposed by maintaining payroll during jury service, especially for larger employers with multiple employees potentially serving at once. The bill may incite further discussions about balancing civic duties with the financial realities faced by businesses.

Enforcement

Violations of the provisions outlined in S152 are categorized as a disorderly persons offense, and affected employees would have the right to pursue civil action against employers who infringe these protections. This includes seeking damages for lost compensation, as well as legal fees if they are successful in court. The bill stipulates that civil suits must be filed within 90 days of the violation or the completion of jury service, aiming to ensure timely recourse for employees.

Companion Bills

NJ S312

Carry Over Requires certain employers with State contracts to pay their employees their usual compensation for each day of jury service.

Similar Bills

AZ HB2445

Task order contracts; website; posting

AZ HB2895

Task order contracts; website; posting

CA AB1931

Insurance: home protection companies.

CA AB483

Fixed term installment contracts: early termination fees.

CA AB2187

Public contracts: contracts for services.

CA AB1809

Public contracts: school and community college districts.

CA SB272

San Mateo County Transit District: job order contracting: pilot program.

NJ S3306

Requires notification to members of health club if club is to be sold and health club services contract assigned to new owner.