Urges President and Congress to enact certain legislation regarding drones.
Impact
AR42 aims to establish a federal framework to address the increasing threat posed by unmanned aircraft, particularly in light of their unauthorized presence over sensitive areas. The resolution highlights the limitations of current federal aviation statutes, which do not allow the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to delegate enforcement actions to state or local governments, thereby restricting local law enforcement's ability to respond effectively to these incidents. By urging concurrent federal legislation, the resolution aspires to enhance the tools available for local and state authorities to manage and mitigate drone-related offenses.
Summary
Assembly Resolution No. 42 (AR42) calls upon the President of the United States and Congress to enact two specific pieces of legislation concerning unmanned aircraft systems, notably the 'Drone Act of 2023' and the 'SHIELD U Act.' The resolution emphasizes the alarming frequency of drone sightings across New Jersey, particularly near sensitive locations such as military installations and the residence of the President-elect. This pattern has raised significant concerns among residents and prompted a federal investigation into the activities associated with these sightings.
Contention
Supporters of AR42 are particularly concerned about public safety and national security, stating that unauthorized drone incursions could lead to potential threats in sensitive areas. Critics may argue, however, that increased regulation could infringe on the personal liberties of drone hobbyists and legitimate users. The call for Congress to pass the 'Drone Act of 2023' seeks to criminalize misuse of drones, while the 'SHIELD U Act' aims to expand counter-drone measures, highlighting the tension between safety and regulation versus personal freedom and innovation in drone technology.
Legislation_summary
The resolution encourages two specific legislative measures: Senate Bill No. 157 ('The Drone Act of 2023') focuses on criminalizing the misuse of drones, whereas Senate Bill No. 896 ('The SHIELD U Act') seeks to authorize counter-drone activities, allowing state and local law enforcement agencies to take proactive measures in dealing with unauthorized drone flights. If enacted, these bills would empower local entities to respond to public safety concerns directly associated with drone operations, thereby enabling them to alleviate the widespread fear experienced by New Jersey residents.
Applying to the Congress of the United States to call a convention under Article V of the United States Constitution for the limited purpose of proposing one or more amendments to the constitution to impose fiscal restraints on the federal government, to limit the power and jurisdiction of the federal government, and to limit the terms of office of federal officials and members of Congress.
Applying to the Congress of the United States to call a convention under Article V of the United States Constitution for the limited purpose of proposing one or more amendments to the constitution to impose fiscal restraints on the federal government, to limit the power and jurisdiction of the federal government, and to limit the terms of office of federal officials and members of Congress.