New Jersey 2026-2027 Regular Session

New Jersey Assembly Bill ACR89

Introduced
1/13/26  

Caption

Proposes constitutional amendment to prohibit use of eminent domain to take active farmland in certain circumstances.

Impact

Should ACR89 pass, it will have far-reaching implications for state laws governing property rights and the powers of various governmental entities. The existing ability of the government to invoke eminent domain for public purposes while compensating property owners will be limited when it comes to farmland. However, there is a notable exception: if the land is taken but remains bound to agricultural use in perpetuity, the government can still proceed with eminent domain. This provision aims to strike a balance between necessary public developments and the preservation of the agricultural sector, reflecting the value placed on locally produced food and farm sustainability.

Summary

ACR89 proposes a significant constitutional amendment to the New Jersey Constitution aimed at prohibiting the use of eminent domain to acquire active farmland under specific circumstances. The amendment seeks to protect land that is actively devoted to agricultural or horticultural use from being taken by the state, municipalities, and other public entities for non-farming purposes. If enacted, this would ensure that farmland cannot be repurposed for developments that do not involve agricultural practices, thereby striving to secure the agricultural landscape and support local farming communities. This legislative effort is a pivotal step towards clarifying the extent of government powers in land acquisition as it relates to active agriculture.

Contention

The proposed amendment may generate debates regarding the balance between private property rights and community needs. On one side, supporters argue that protecting farmland from eminent domain abuse is crucial for sustaining agriculture and food production. On the other side, some may voice concerns that too strict a limitation on eminent domain could hinder future development projects that might benefit the public. Additionally, discussions may arise regarding the definition of 'active farmland' and the implications of the exemption, raising questions on how property intended for agricultural use will be monitored and enforced post-acquisition.

Companion Bills

NJ ACR171

Carry Over Proposes constitutional amendment to prohibit use of eminent domain to take active farmland in certain circumstances.

NJ SCR136

Carry Over Proposes constitutional amendment to prohibit use of eminent domain to take active farmland in certain circumstances.

NJ SCR17

Same As Proposes constitutional amendment to prohibit use of eminent domain to take active farmland in certain circumstances.

Similar Bills

LA HB472

(Constitutional Amendment) Revises Article VII of the Constitution of La. (OR -$139,000,000 GF RV See Note)

NJ ACR123

Proposes temporary constitutional amendment allowing State constitutional convention convened to reform system of property taxation to propose statutory changes.

NJ SCR75

Proposes temporary constitutional amendment allowing State constitutional convention convened to reform system of property taxation to propose statutory changes.

NJ SCR43

Proposes constitutional amendment authorizing Legislature to invalidate certain court decisions.

LA HB244

(Constitutional Amendment) Provides for the election of constitutional convention delegates and vote requirements necessary for the adoption of a new constitution (RR SEE FISC NOTE GF EX)

LA HB678

(Constitutional Amendment) Modifies disposition of certain state revenues through repeal of the Revenue Stabilization Trust Fund and deposits of certain revenue streams into the Budget Stabilization Fund (RRF INCREASE GF RV See Note)

LA HB473

(Constitutional Amendment) Provides relative to the application of state monies to the unfunded accrued liability of the Teachers' Retirement System of La. (EN DECREASE SD RV See Note)

HI SB1225

Proposing An Amendment To Article Xvii, Section 3 Of The Hawaii Constitution To Specify That The Standard For Voter Approval Of A Constitutional Amendment Proposed By The Legislature Is A Majority Of All The Votes Tallied Upon The Question.