Urging Congress to find that the Piscataqua River and Portsmouth Harbor lie within the state of New Hampshire.
Impact
If adopted, HR 45 would affirm New Hampshire's claim over the Piscataqua River and Portsmouth Harbor, reinforcing state sovereignty in matters of local governance and natural resources. This resolution is viewed as vital for maintaining jurisdiction over areas that have significant economic and cultural value, potentially influencing future legislation related to environmental management and local authority. By clarifying state boundaries, the resolution seeks to ensure better enforcement of laws and adequate protection of natural resources in the region.
Summary
House Resolution 45 urges Congress to establish that the Piscataqua River and Portsmouth Harbor lie within the state of New Hampshire. The resolution contends that the state has complete dominion and title over the river and its submerged lands, which are crucial for New Hampshire's interests and public trust. The resolution references past attempts by the state to define the river's boundary, including the petition to the United States Supreme Court, which was declined. It emphasizes the importance of state protection and management of its waterways for the benefit of its residents.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding HR 45 is largely supportive within New Hampshire, portraying a collective state identity and jurisdictional integrity. Legislators express a need for legislative acknowledgment of New Hampshire's authority over the river, highlighting a strong regional pride and a desire for self-determination. Conversely, some voices may question the implications of extending jurisdiction over waterways that could affect cross-state relations with Maine, suggesting an undercurrent of potential contention regarding inter-state boundaries.
Contention
Notably, HR 45 addresses a historical context of boundary disputes particularly concerning the Piscataqua River. Some critics might voice concerns regarding the potential for escalation in jurisdictional claims that could lead to conflicts with neighboring Maine. The resolution's focus on establishing clear boundaries also raises important discussions around resource management and inter-state cooperation. The implementation of the bill could set a precedent for similar claims in other regions, reflecting the complexities of state and federal jurisdiction.
Urging the New Hampshire congressional delegation to sponsor legislation relative to, and urging the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) to adopt regulations, allowing for small scale and very small slaughter plants to use the Federal Meat Inspection Acts Custom Exempt meat processing inspection criteria with a third-party inspector present at slaughter, so that processed beef, pork, lamb, and chevron (goat meat) can be sold as individual cuts directly from the farm producer to the end consumer.
Rescinding House Concurrent Resolution No. 40 passed by the 2012 New Hampshire General Court asking that Congress call a convention under Article V of the United States Constitution.
Establishing a recruitment incentive program within the community college system for public safety communicators and dispatchers and making an appropriation therefor.