New Hampshire House Bill HR36

New Hampshire 2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 12/1/25
• Refer: 12/1/25
• Report Pass: 2/4/26
• Report DNP: 2/4/26

Caption

Urging the federal government to accept cash at all points of service.

Impact

If passed, HR36 would have implications for how federal agencies and contractors conduct transactions, mandating that they accept cash in accordance with existing laws that designate U.S. currency as legal tender for all debts and public charges. This could potentially increase the availability of services for individuals who prefer or require cash transactions, promoting financial inclusion. The resolution asserts that the current practices could be problematic and calls for a reevaluation of policies that may disadvantage cash users.

Summary

House Resolution 36 (HR36) urges the federal government to accept cash as a valid form of payment at all points of service. The bill emphasizes the importance of cash as legal tender and argues that not accepting it undermines the currency's value and credibility. It seeks to ensure that citizens are not compelled to rely solely on electronic payment methods, which can involve 'convenience fees' that raise the cost of transactions. This resolution reflects concerns about the accessibility of financial services for all citizens, including those who may not have access to digital payment methods.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HR36 is generally positive among its sponsors and supporters, who view it as a necessary step to protect consumers' rights to use cash without incurring additional fees. However, there may be resistance from advocates of electronic payment methods and related industries, who argue that the push for cash acceptance could create logistical challenges. Supporters argue that the resolution aligns with constitutional provisions and historical monetary policies, presenting it as a common-sense protection for consumers.

Contention

A notable point of contention is the ongoing trend towards digital transactions and the potential resistance from federal agencies to adapt to the demands for cash acceptance. Critics of the bill may argue that the preference for digital payments reflects an evolving financial landscape and that resistance to these changes could hinder efficiency. Additionally, proponents highlight the necessity of cash for certain demographics, such as the elderly and underserved populations, arguing that financial accessibility needs to be prioritized over the push for modernization of payment systems.