New Hampshire House Bill HR33

New Hampshire 2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 12/1/25
• Refer: 12/1/25
• Report DNP: 2/3/26

Caption

Affirming the state of California's request to divide into 2 states.

Impact

If successful, HR33 could significantly influence the political landscape of both California and the United States. The proposed division is rooted in the principle of federalism, aiming to enable governance that is more responsive and representative of local populations. Advocates argue that this would lead to more efficient government through competition among political entities. However, the practical implications concerning federal approval, resource allocation, and regional governance remain contentious and would require thorough examination.

Summary

House Resolution 33 (HR33) affirms California's request to divide into two states. The resolution expresses support for California Assembly Joint Resolution 23, which seeks to create two separate political entities from the existing state. This initiative emerges from long-standing frustrations among citizens and regions in California that feel constrained by laws and regulations imposed by more populous areas. The resolution advocates for self-determination and decentralization of governance to better serve the diverse interests of California's population.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HR33 appears to resonate with a portion of the population who feel underrepresented within the current state framework. This resolution has garnered support from those advocating for greater local autonomy and better representation. On the other hand, it may face resistance from those who view the division as impractical or believe it would complicate existing governance structures, posing significant challenges in implementation and coordination across state lines.

Contention

Notable points of contention involve the feasibility of dividing a state and the subsequent impact on federal and state resources, representation, and governance. Critics may argue against potential disruptions to public services and funding, as well as the political ramifications of creating two new state identities. Debates are likely to arise around the rights of citizens in both regions and the broader implications for political representation and governance efficiency.