New Hampshire 2026 Regular Session

New Hampshire House Bill HB1135

Introduced
12/1/25  
Refer
12/1/25  
Report Pass
2/24/26  
Engrossed
3/6/26  
Refer
3/6/26  

Caption

Prohibiting the acquisition of prescriptive rights in private roads through adverse use.

Impact

If enacted, HB 1135 would significantly clarify and strengthen the rights of landowners in New Hampshire regarding their private roads and pathways. It would eliminate the possibility of individuals gaining legal rights to use someone's property based on continuous use over time, thereby ensuring that property rights are upheld and preventing potential disputes about access and ownership rights. Additionally, this act includes a provision that it does not retroactively affect claims that were already fully adjudicated before the law's effective date.

Summary

House Bill 1135 is legislation aimed at prohibiting the acquisition of prescriptive rights in private roads, driveways, paths, and trails through adverse use. The bill stipulates that the use of a landowner's property by any individual or the public will not confer any legal rights or easements through adverse possession, regardless of how long such usage has occurred. This legislation responds to concerns over the informal establishment of rights through historical usage patterns and seeks to reaffirm the controlling interests of private property owners.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HB 1135 appears to be largely supportive among property owners and those concerned with defining and protecting property rights. Proponents of the bill argue that it establishes clear boundaries for property usage, which is critical in preventing confusion and legal challenges arising from adverse use claims. However, there may be concerns among advocates for public access and community rights, as the bill could limit the public's ability to access certain frequently used private paths or trails, potentially leading to opposition from those groups.

Contention

Notable points of contention may arise regarding the balance between private property rights and public access. Critics of the bill might argue that it could lead to the restriction of community access to trails that have been traditionally used by the public. Furthermore, as there is a growing emphasis on preserving access to natural spaces and promoting outdoor activities, some community members may feel the bill's provisions could undermine those values and limit recreational opportunities.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

NH SB247

Prohibiting network exclusion for pharmacies that refuse to dispense a prescription of the PBM reimbursement that is below the pharmacy's acquisition cost.

NH HB414

Prohibiting the division of motor vehicles from suspending a license on the basis of debt owed to a private entity related to the towing or storing of a motor vehicle.

NH HB100

Prohibiting the use of state funds for new passenger rail projects.

NH SB139

Creating a private right of action in civil rights cases.

NH HB296

Relative to issuing building permits along private roads.

NH SB281

Prohibiting municipalities from denying building or occupancy permits for property adjacent to class VI roads under certain circumstances.

NH HB575

Prohibiting offshore wind energy infrastructure.

NH HB678

Prohibiting the sale of over-the-counter weight loss and muscle building supplements to minors.

NH HB152

Prohibiting the sale and use of adhesive-based rodent traps.

NH HB641

Establishing a private right of action for civil rights violations.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.