North Carolina 2025-2026 Regular Session

North Carolina Senate Bill S975

Introduced
4/30/26  
Refer
5/4/26  

Caption

State Digital Asset Payments Study Act

Impact

The bill represents a significant move towards modernizing government payment systems while aligning with advancements in blockchain technology. With an increasing number of North Carolina residents sending money abroad, the legislation seeks to assess alternative payment systems that could alleviate transaction costs. This study could lead to recommendations that enhance consumer protections and maintain regulatory compliance while potentially implementing digital currencies in state payments.

Summary

Senate Bill 975, known as the State Digital Asset Payments Study Act, aims to direct the Department of State Treasurer to conduct a comprehensive study on the feasibility of accepting digital assets for certain state fees. Additionally, it seeks to evaluate household remittance costs and the potential of international payment mechanisms to reduce these costs for North Carolinians. The bill recognizes the growing significance of digital assets in modernizing payment systems and addresses the financial burdens that remittance fees impose on working households within the state.

Sentiment

Generally, the sentiment surrounding SB 975 is supportive among proponents who believe it could streamline processes and reduce costs for consumers. However, there are concerns over risks associated with digital assets, including cybersecurity and financial compliance issues. The legislation has ignited discussions around the balance between innovation in financial technology and necessary consumer safeguards, indicating a cautious but optimistic approach to digital transformations in state functions.

Contention

While the bill does not mandate the acceptance of digital assets by state agencies nor does it authorize any state agency to hold such assets, it does open discussions about the role and utility of digital currencies in a regulatory context. Notable points of contention may arise from differing opinions on the implications of introducing digital assets into government transactions, the adequacy of existing consumer protections, and the potential complexities involved in implementing such systems.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

NC HB377

AN ACT relating to digital assets.

NC H92

NC Digital Assets Investments Act

NC AB2409

Digital assets: meme coins.

NC HB701

AN ACT relating to blockchain digital assets.

NC HB825

AN ACT relating to digital assets.

NC HB1891

State government; Oklahoma State Treasurer; digital assets; precious metals; Digital Asset Property Fund; effective date.

NC HB1891

State government; Oklahoma State Treasurer; digital assets; precious metals; Digital Asset Property Fund; effective date.

NC SB17

Digital assets, prohibits the state from certain actions related to digital assets and exempts certain actions from classification as a security or money transfer

NC SB759

Financial Institutions - Digital Assets and Digital Asset Staking - Regulation (Maryland Financial Innovation Act of 2026)

NC HB859

Financial Institutions - Digital Assets and Digital Asset Staking - Regulation (Maryland Financial Innovation Act of 2026)

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.