North Carolina 2025-2026 Regular Session

North Carolina Senate Bill S801

Introduced
4/21/26  

Caption

Protect Special Ops Forces/No Doxing/Funds

Impact

The implications of S801 on state laws include the establishment of civil liability for doxing, specifically targeting the unauthorized publication of private information with harmful intent. If enacted, individuals who violate these provisions could face civil actions resulting in compensatory, punitive, or statutory damages. This legislation seeks to address a serious concern for special operations personnel given their unique vulnerabilities, especially in light of potential threats from hostile entities. The bill emphasizes the balance between public access to information and the essential need to protect those who serve in high-risk roles.

Summary

Senate Bill 801, titled 'Protect Special Ops Forces/No Doxing/Funds', is legislated to enhance the protection of the identification and location information of current and former special operations personnel and their dependents. It aims to exempt such sensitive information from public record requirements, thus safeguarding these individuals from potential threats posed by the unauthorized disclosure of their personal information. Additionally, the bill expands the existing Address Confidentiality Program to include special operations forces, ensuring that their addresses remain confidential and secure from public scrutiny.

Sentiment

Discussion surrounding S801 has generally favored the bill as a protective measure for military families. Proponents argue that such protections are vital given the critical nature of the roles played by special operations personnel. However, there might be some contention regarding governmental transparency versus individual rights, with opponents possibly expressing concern about the potential overreach in limiting public access to information. Overall, the sentiment leans towards strong support from those in the military community and defense sectors, who value the added layers of security.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the balance of liberty and security in handling public records. While supporters emphasize the need for confidentiality to protect military families, critics may argue about the implications of restricting access to public information. Furthermore, the enforcement of liability provisions in cases of doxing introduces a complex landscape of legal consequences that could affect freedom of expression. These debates illustrate broader discussions on privacy rights and public disclosure laws.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

NC SB27

Stalking; offense of doxxing; penalties; protective order; provide

NC S0786

Prohibit Doxing of a Minor

NC SB074

Highly Specialized Employment Leave Protection Exemption

NC S1252

Establishing a right to freedom from doxing

NC SB107

Specialized Land Transactions; protections of homeowners in community associations; provide

NC S84

"Barnegat Bay Protection Act"; establishes Barnegat Bay Protection Fund, dedicates portion of sales tax on fertilizer, authorizes special license plates, and provides for donations.

NC H1055

Pub. Rec./State Attorney and Office of Statewide Prosecution Nonlegal Support Staff

NC S1084

Public Records/State Attorney's Office and Office of Statewide Prosecution Nonlegal Support Staff

NC HB1447

Mississippi Social Media Fraud Accountability and Consumer Protection Act; create.

NC SB272

Create rules of conduct for child protection specialists

Similar Bills

AZ SB1656

Family court; professional personnel; requirements

AZ SB1147

Family court; post decree; experts

CA AB1749

Interfering with wildfire suppression with drone.

CA AB606

Certificated employees: professional services credential: out-of-state applicants.

OR HB2891

Relating to personnel records kept for faculty members at institutions of higher education.

AZ HB2036

ASRS; temporary personnel service

CA SB513

An act to amend Section 1198.

CA AB426

An act to add Section 53069.