North Carolina 2025-2026 Regular Session

North Carolina House Bill H335

Introduced
3/6/25  
Refer
3/10/25  
Report Pass
4/8/25  

Caption

Expand Emergency Judge Eligibility

Impact

The bill's passage is expected to have a significant impact on the state's legal proceedings by enhancing the capacity of the courts to deal with fluctuating caseloads. It allows for a more flexible deployment of judiciary resources, particularly in times of crisis or increased demand, thereby maintaining access to justice for the public. By enabling a broader pool of retired judges to serve in emergencies, the bill supports the overall efficiency of the judicial process in North Carolina.

Summary

House Bill 335 seeks to expand the eligibility criteria for emergency judges within the North Carolina judicial system. Specifically, this bill allows judges who have retired after serving as both a superior court judge and a district court judge to serve as emergency judges in either court. The aim is to increase the number of available emergency judges, which can be critical in times of judicial overload or emergencies where additional judicial resources are required to maintain court functions and provide timely justice.

Sentiment

The sentiment towards HB 335 appears to be generally supportive among lawmakers. Proponents argue that the bill promotes the optimal use of experienced judicial figures who can step in during critical times, thereby enhancing the responsiveness of the judicial system. However, there may be some concerns around the selection process for emergency judges and ensuring the quality and qualifications of those who serve in such critical roles.

Contention

While there is no significant opposition highlighted in the discussions around HB 335, some potential points of contention could arise regarding how the Chief Justice manages the assignment of emergency judges or how the expanded eligibility may affect perceptions of retired judges returning to service. These concerns might involve discussions about maintaining judicial quality and ensuring that the selection process is transparent and equitable.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

NC S1032

Modify Emergency Judge Provisions

NC A08890

Relates to expanding eligibility for judges presiding over designated youth parts.

NC S08196

Relates to expanding eligibility for judges presiding over designated youth parts.

NC S964

Expanded Acc. to Doulas and Midwives/BC Lic

NC H129

Judge Joe John Nonpartisan Jud. Elections Act

NC S107

Judge Joe John Nonpartisan Jud. Elections Act

NC S3342

Increases statutory mandatory retirement age for Supreme Court Justices, Superior Court Judges, Tax Court Judges, Administrative Law Judges, and Workers' Compensation Judges from 70 to 75.

NC H620

AOC Agency Requests.-AB

NC S2290

Increases statutory mandatory retirement age for Supreme Court Justices, Superior Court Judges, Tax Court Judges, Administrative Law Judges, Workers' Compensation Judges and county prosecutors from 70 to 72.

NC S648

AOC Agency Requests.-AB

Similar Bills

CA AB1513

Election procedures: certified mail and superior courts.

MA H1937

Relative to the Commonwealth’s right to appeal bail decisions

CA AB1917

Criminal procedure: information.

NC S1032

Modify Emergency Judge Provisions

DC B26-0441

Let Our Vows Endure Amendment Act of 2025

NJ SCR55

Proposes constitutional amendment to increase mandatory retirement age for judges and justices from 70 to 72.

IN HB1144

Courts.

CT HB05344

An Act Concerning Superior Court Venue For Election Cases.