Montana 2025 Regular Session

Montana Senate Bill SB22

Introduced
12/18/24  
Refer
1/7/25  
Engrossed
1/27/25  
Refer
1/27/25  
Enrolled
3/18/25  

Caption

Revise class d motor carrier deadline adjustment laws

Impact

The implications of SB 22 on state law include an amendment to Section 69-12-321 of the MCA, which outlines the processes for motor carrier applications and their respective hearings. By extending the timeline for hearings from 60 to 90 days when a protest or request is received, the bill aims to promote better oversight and ensure adequate representation of public interest. This statute revision is intended to provide an improved mechanism for evaluating motor carrier services and public necessity, thereby enhancing regulatory efficiency and effectiveness.

Summary

Senate Bill 22 aims to revise the existing motor carrier regulation laws in Montana, specifically focusing on the processes involved in obtaining a motor carrier certificate. The bill advocates for an extension of the timeline for hearings concerning applications submitted by Class A, Class D, and Class E motor carriers. By increasing the time granted for these hearings, the bill potentially allows for more thorough considerations of each application, benefiting both the applicants and those affected by the proposed motor carrier operations.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 22 appears to be largely positive, as it is supported by lawmakers who see the benefits of a more structured application process. Proponents argue that this change will facilitate growth in the transportation sector while safeguarding public interests by allowing sufficient time for public feedback. However, potential concerns about delays in service provision may arise, especially from stakeholders eager for decisive action on applications, indicating a balanced view among different user groups.

Contention

While SB 22 has a fair amount of support, there are concerns regarding the extension of hearing timelines, especially from businesses that rely on expedient service provision. Critics may argue that longer wait times could hinder operational efficiency and affect competition within the transportation industry. Stakeholder discussions indicate a need to balance thorough regulatory processes with the practical necessities of business operations in order to ensure both safety and efficiency within the motor carrier market.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

MT HB517

Revising classification and motor carrier certificate laws

MT HB518

Generally revise public utilities and carriers laws

MT HB596

Revise regulations relating to motor carriers hauling trash

MT SB180

Revises provisions relating to motor carriers. (BDR 58-963)

MT AB524

Revises provisions governing motor carriers. (BDR 43-784)

MT HB1422

Relating To Motor Carriers.

MT HB1458

USE/OCC TX-MOTOR CARRIERS

MT HB2446

Motor carriers; English proficiency

MT SB1510

Relating To Motor Carriers.

MT SB1510

Relating To Motor Carriers.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.