Montana 2025 Regular Session

Montana House Bill HB228

Introduced
1/15/25  
Refer
1/16/25  
Engrossed
2/6/25  
Refer
2/14/25  
Enrolled
3/31/25  
Enrolled
4/28/25  

Caption

Revised requirements for the reporting of actual costs for legislation with projected fiscal impacts

Impact

If passed, HB 228 would change the landscape of fiscal reporting in Montana by requiring more frequent updates regarding the actual expenditures of bills that exceed $500,000 from the general fund. By mandating semi-annual reports, stakeholders—including lawmakers, the public, and budget planners—could gain insights into budgetary impacts more regularly, facilitating more informed decision-making and accountability regarding state expenditures.

Summary

House Bill 228 aims to revise the requirements for the reporting of actual costs associated with legislation that carries projected fiscal impacts. Specifically, it modifies the reporting period from annually to every six months, enhances detail in expenditure descriptions, and includes a repeal of a previous termination date for these reports. Overall, the bill seeks to ensure more transparency and accountability in how fiscal impacts are managed and reported by the Montana government.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 228 appears to be largely positive among legislators who value fiscal responsibility and transparency. Proponents argue that the revision in reporting frequency and detail is a necessary step towards better governance and effective allocation of state resources. However, there may be some concerns raised regarding the additional burden this could place on the Office of Budget and Program Planning and other entities responsible for compliance with the new requirements.

Contention

One point of contention may arise from discussions around the practicality of implementing more frequent reporting. Lawmakers may debate the budgetary and administrative implications of increased reporting requirements, particularly in terms of time and resource allocation for the Office of Budget and Program Planning. Critics could argue that while transparency is important, the new requirements may lead to inefficiencies or complexities in the budgeting process that may not justify the potential benefits.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

MT HB279

Actuarial Review Of Certain Legislation

MT HB259

Actuarial Review Of Health Legislation

MT SF4603

Comparison of actual expenditures requirement in forecasted programs to projected spending from prior forecasts

MT HB625

Withhold entitlement share for non-compliance with child abuse reporting requirements

MT S2980

Revises reporting requirements for nursing homes concerning financial disclosures and ownership structure.

MT A4722

Revises reporting requirements for nursing homes concerning financial disclosures and ownership structure.

MT HR243

To authorize and direct the legislative auditor to study the fiscal impact of establishing and operating a sentencing review panel for non-unanimous jury verdicts (EN NO IMPACT See Note)

MT SB15

Provides for reporting requirements relative to the state and statewide retirement systems. (6/30/26) (OR NO IMPACT FC)

MT HF4715

Comparison of actual expenditures in forecasted programs to projected spending from prior forecasts required, notice to legislative auditor when actual expenditures deviate required, other budget oversight and accountability provisions modified, and money appropriated.

MT SB69

Revise county attorney reporting requirements for child sexual abuse

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.