Mississippi 2026 Regular Session

Mississippi Senate Bill SB3191

Introduced
2/23/26  
Refer
2/23/26  
Engrossed
2/25/26  
Refer
2/26/26  

Caption

Sales tax; exclude processing or interchange fees charged for electronic payment transactions from "gross proceeds of sales."

Impact

If enacted, SB3191 would directly impact the way sales tax is calculated for transactions involving electronic payments. Specifically, businesses would no longer be taxed on the fees incurred during these transactions, which could result in lower operational costs for them. This change is likely to encourage more businesses to adopt electronic payment methods, contributing to the broader trend of digitization in commerce. The implications of this legislation could also affect revenue collections for the state, as fee exclusions may decrease total taxable sales figures.

Summary

Senate Bill 3191 aims to amend the Mississippi Code of 1972 by excluding debit card, credit card, or processing fees from the definition of 'gross proceeds of sales.' This legislative change is intended to clarify what revenue is subject to sales tax, thereby potentially lowering the overall taxable amount for businesses accepting electronic payments. By implementing this exclusion, the bill seeks to provide more favorable conditions for businesses that rely on electronic payment systems, which have become increasingly prevalent in the modern economy.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB3191 appears to be generally positive from the business community, particularly among retailers and service providers who process a high volume of credit and debit card transactions. Supporters argue that it will ease the financial burden on businesses and promote fairer taxation practices. However, this favorable outlook may not be universal; concerns have been raised regarding the potential loss of state revenue due to this exclusion, prompting debates among legislators about the long-term fiscal implications.

Contention

Notable points of contention regarding SB3191 include the potential decreases in state revenue that might arise from exempting processing fees from sales tax. Opponents may argue that this change disproportionately benefits larger businesses that can absorb these processing costs, while small businesses might still struggle with fees associated with electronic payments. Additionally, there are concerns about how such exclusions could complicate sales tax regulations and compliance for businesses, which may need to adapt their accounting practices to comply with the new definitions proposed in the bill.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

MS HB211

Income tax; exclude payment for property taken by eminent domain from gross income.

MS HB1710

Income tax; exclude tips from gross income.

MS HB504

Income tax; exclude overtime compensation from gross income.

MS HB52

Sales tax; exempt on retail sales of certain electronic devices.

MS HB1720

Income tax; exclude from gross income certain forgiven, cancelled or discharged federal student loan debt.

MS SB2553

Income tax; exclude from gross income compensation and income of honorably discharged veterans.

MS HB304

Sales tax; exempt certain retail sales of electronic devices/educational software and sales of feminine hygiene products.

MS SB2570

Groceries; exempt from state sales tax, and authorize municipalities to levy sales tax at lower rate.

MS HB1653

Income tax; exclude forgiven, cancelled or discharged federal student loan debt under the PSLF Program from the definition of "gross income".

MS SB2815

Income tax; exclude full-time law enforcement officer compensation up to $20,000.00 from definition of "gross income."

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.