Allows a person to bring a cause of action against another person or entity for damages for failing to state certain content is generated or modified using artificial intelligence
Impact
If enacted, HB 1747 would amend existing statutes under chapter 537 of Missouri law to enable individuals to file lawsuits for damages if they suffer harm due to failing to disclose that content was generated or modified by artificial intelligence. The introduction of this framework is intended to provide individuals with legitimate avenues for seeking recourse against entities that do not disclose pertinent information, thereby improving transparency and accountability within the digital content landscape.
Summary
House Bill 1747 proposes new legal provisions relating to civil actions for damages concerning artificial intelligence-generated or modified content. Under this bill, any image, video, or audio that is altered or created using artificial intelligence must be marked as such by the publisher or disseminator. This mark or statement, which is to be developed by the secretary of state, aims to ensure transparency regarding the origins of the content, thus better informing the audience about the nature of the materials they are engaging with.
Sentiment
The reception of HB 1747 among legislators and the public appears to be mixed. Advocates argue that the bill is a necessary step in addressing the ethical implications of artificial intelligence in media, promoting consumer awareness and protection from potential misuse of AI technology. Conversely, critics have expressed concerns that the requirements might stifle creativity and innovation in content production, as well as raise questions about the practicality and enforcement of liability regarding AI-generated content.
Contention
One notable point of contention surrounding HB 1747 involves the challenge of defining what constitutes adequate disclosure regarding AI-generated content. Legislators and stakeholders have raised questions about the impact on artistic expression and the feasibility for creators and publishers to consistently comply with the proposed marking requirements. There is also concern about potential implications for liability, especially regarding how damages would be assessed and the burden of proof placed on individuals claiming injury as a consequence of non-compliance.
Establishes the Biometric Information Privacy Act, which establishes requirements for and a cause of action against private entities in possession of biometric information