Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Minnesota Senate Bill SF2912

Introduced
3/24/25  

Caption

Geolocation and smartphone monitoring of another prohibition in certain circumstances

Impact

If enacted, SF2912 would significantly enhance protection for individuals against unauthorized surveillance and data sharing practices. It introduces legal consequences for those who violate these provisions, allowing individuals whose data has been improperly accessed to seek damages in court, including financial compensation for mental anguish. The bill aims to empower individuals over their digital footprints, thus fostering greater accountability for software developers and companies that provide monitoring applications.

Summary

SF2912 is a proposed bill in Minnesota that seeks to address concerns around geolocation tracking and smartphone monitoring without consent. The bill prohibits the unauthorized tracking or sharing of an individual's geolocation information, text messages, and access to microphone or camera data from smartphones. It sets forth specific requirements for software and applications that track or record such information, mandating conspicuous notifications, two-factor authentication, and explicit consent from device owners. This legislative move comes amid growing public awareness and concern regarding personal data privacy in the digital era.

Contention

The introduction of this bill may ignite debate regarding the balance between privacy rights and the needs of employers or agencies that might require access to such information for legitimate reasons. Proponents of the bill argue that it is a necessary shield against potential abuses of technology, while critics may express concern over how it could hinder legitimate business practices, particularly in industries reliant on monitoring for safety or productivity. Notably, exceptions in the bill, such as those permitting parents to monitor minors or employers monitoring employees with consent, could also lead to discussions about what constitutes appropriate oversight versus invasive practices.

Companion Bills

MN HF2313

Similar To Geolocation and smartphone monitoring of another person prohibited, and cause of action when violation has occurred provided.

Previously Filed As

MN HF2313

Geolocation and smartphone monitoring of another person prohibited, and cause of action when violation has occurred provided.

MN AB1644

Pupils: use of smartphones: prohibition: report.

MN AB235

Pupils: use of smartphones.

MN AB962

Pupil safety: comprehensive school safety plans: use of smartphones.

MN SF5221

Geolocation data provisions establishment

MN HF1627

PFAS products exempted or prohibitions delayed, PFAS reporting requirements modified, lead-containing product prohibitions delayed, and PFAS-containing firefighting foam prohibitions at airport hangars delayed.

MN HB222

Pardons and paroles, sharing of electronic monitoring data in certain circumstances authorized

MN SB134

Pardons and paroles, sharing of electronic monitoring data in certain circumstances authorized

MN SF4474

Online sweepstakes games prohibition

MN SB722

Agriculture; prohibiting electronic monitoring of certain animals. Effective date.

Similar Bills

HI SB2052

Relating To Right To Repair.

CA AB1644

Pupils: use of smartphones: prohibition: report.

CA AB235

Pupils: use of smartphones.

CA AB962

Pupil safety: comprehensive school safety plans: use of smartphones.

MD HB147

County Boards of Education - Student Technology Use Policy - Requirements

MD SB130

Education - Student Personal Electronic Device Use Policy - Required

MN HF2313

Geolocation and smartphone monitoring of another person prohibited, and cause of action when violation has occurred provided.

DC B26-0482

DC Youth Links App Act of 2025