Minnesota House Bill HF5064

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/22/26
• Refer: 4/22/26

Caption

Coercing a pregnant minor female into seeking or obtaining an abortion prohibited, suspected cases of human trafficking of minors screened and reported, certain information required to be displayed, action for wrongful death resulting from abortion added, and rulemaking required.

Impact

If enacted, HF5064 would strengthen state laws concerning the rights of minors facing unwanted pregnancies by establishing a clear legal definition of coercion in the context of abortion. Healthcare providers will also be required to assess whether a minor's request for an abortion is voluntary, introducing a legal duty to ensure that minors are not subjected to external pressures. The bill stipulates that failure to comply with these requirements could lead to substantial fines and even the potential for wrongful death lawsuits if a minor is coerced into having an abortion.

Summary

House File 5064 (HF5064) seeks to enhance the legal protections for pregnant minors in Minnesota by prohibiting any form of coercion to seek or obtain an abortion. The bill explicitly defines coercion and outlines various methods through which individuals may attempt to exert control over pregnant minors. It categorically states that any act of coercion will result in severe penalties, including felony charges in cases involving forced abortions. This framework aims to create a safer environment for young women confronting unplanned pregnancies, allowing them the autonomy to make decisions without undue influence or pressure from others.

Contention

Notable points of contention regarding HF5064 may arise around the practical implications of enforcing the bill's provisions. Critics argue that while the intent is to protect vulnerable populations, there may also be concerns regarding the practicalities of screening for coercion. Additionally, opposition may focus on whether the bill limits access to abortion services for minors in need. Supporters, on the other hand, emphasize the necessity of such protections to combat human trafficking and to ensure that minors are not exploited during vulnerable times. The balance between safeguarding rights and maintaining access to necessary healthcare services remains a significant theme in discussions surrounding this legislation.