Michigan Senate Bill SB0928

Michigan 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/23/26
• Refer: 4/23/26

Caption

Health: licensing; behavioral health transportation licensing requirements; provide for. Amends 1974 PA 258 (MCL 330.1001 - 330.2106) by adding ch. 9B. TIE BAR WITH: SB 0927'26

Impact

The legislation mandates that behavioral health transport must cater to individuals deemed medically stable, emphasizing the necessity for adherence to specific criteria for transport services. Transportation agencies would be required to secure licensing and adhere to regulations outlined by the bill. These regulations include comprehensive training for staff, documentation of all transport processes, and maintaining proper vehicles equipped with safety features. Moreover, an annual report detailing operational statistics and compliance will be submitted to the state legislature, establishing a system of accountability and oversight for these transport agencies.

Summary

Senate Bill 928 focuses on creating provisions for behavioral health transport in Michigan, specifically addressing the transportation of individuals experiencing mental health crises. By amending the Mental Health Code, this bill aims to establish a framework for emergency transport services tailored to evaluate and treat individuals in acute mental health situations. Behavioral health transports are positioned as an alternative to traditional medical ambulances for individuals who do not require significant medical intervention but still need secure transport to a mental health facility. Key definitions, such as 'behavioral health transport vehicle' and 'eligible individual,' are articulated to clarify the scope of the bill.

Contention

As the bill stipulates a structured approach to behavioral health transport, there may be concerns over the defined eligibility criteria and the potential limitation of services for individuals with severe medical needs, as those requiring medical intervention will not qualify for transport under this system. This raises questions about the adequacy of the service for vulnerable populations. Advocates for mental health support may debate the balance between facilitating timely access to care and ensuring the safety and rights of individuals during these transports. Critics may argue that further consideration is needed regarding the scope of allowable transport services and the rights of the individuals being transported, particularly in terms of voluntary versus involuntary transports.