Michigan Senate Bill SB0591

Michigan 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 9/25/25
• Refer: 9/25/25
• Report Pass: 12/4/25
• Refer: 12/4/25
• Report Pass: 2/4/26
• Engrossed: 2/19/26
• Refer: 2/19/26

Caption

Recreation: other; act regarding medical emergencies in health clubs; revise cross-reference to the Good Samaritan Act. Amends sec. 3 of 2006 PA 23 (MCL 333.26313). TIE BAR WITH: SB 0590'25

Impact

If enacted, SB 591 would revise the legal standards for health clubs in Michigan, particularly regarding their obligations to assist individuals experiencing medical emergencies. By stating that health club personnel are not required to provide emergency aid when using AEDs, the bill eases the legal burden on these establishments, which may influence their operational policies and decision-making in emergencies. This change could encourage more health clubs to install AEDs, knowing they would not bear the same level of risk for providing assistance during a medical event.

Summary

Senate Bill 591 aims to amend the existing legislation from 2006 PA 23, which regulates health clubs concerning medical emergencies. The primary change proposed in this bill is regarding the liability of health club owners, operators, or employees in the event of a medical emergency involving an Automated External Defibrillator (AED) on the premises. Specifically, the bill states that these individuals do not have a duty to render emergency services related to the use of AEDs, thus potentially limiting their civil liability in such situations. This amendment seeks to clarify responsibilities and reduce the fears of liability that health clubs might face in emergencies.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 591 appears to be cautiously supportive among health club operators and industry stakeholders who have expressed that the current liabilities deter facilities from equipping themselves with emergency gear like AEDs. While proponents argue that this law will enhance the deployment of life-saving equipment, some critics may raise concerns regarding the adequacy of emergency responses and whether this change could lead to complacency among health club staff regarding emergency preparedness.

Contention

Notably, SB 591 ties its enactment to the passage of Senate Bill 590, indicating that it may serve as part of a broader legislative effort to enhance the legal frameworks surrounding health club operations and emergency response. The critique from opponents might stem from fears that such legislative measures could weaken the urgency for health clubs to adequately prepare for medical emergencies. By lessening liability, concerns arise about the potential for inadequate training or response protocols being implemented in health settings where emergency assistance could be vital.