Michigan Senate Bill SB0247

Michigan 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/23/25
• Refer: 4/23/25
• Report Pass: 6/12/25
• Report Pass: 6/17/25
• Refer: 6/12/25
• Refer: 6/17/25
• Report Pass: 8/26/25
• Engrossed: 8/26/25
• Refer: 8/26/25

Caption

Environmental protection: hazardous waste; injection well disposal fee; provide for. Amends sec. 62506a of 1994 PA 451 (MCL 324.62506a).

Impact

If passed, SB 0247 would establish a financial mechanism for managing the environmental impact of hazardous waste disposal. The revenues generated from these fees would be directed into a specially created fund—the disposal well host community fund—designed to support cities and townships where these wells are situated. The intent behind this fund is to promote public health, safety, and welfare by providing financial assistance for local initiatives. This represents a significant shift in how hazardous waste disposal is financed and managed at the local level.

Summary

Senate Bill 0247 aims to amend the Natural Resources and Environmental Protection Act by introducing a fee structure for Class I multisource commercial hazardous waste disposal wells. The bill specifies that owners or operators of these wells will be responsible for paying a fee based on the quantity of hazardous waste injected into the well. The standard fee is set at 0.417 cents per gallon, which will be subject to annual adjustments according to changes in the Consumer Price Index. Exemptions are provided for certain waste types, such as those generated during cleanup activities, but compliance and reporting measures are mandated to ensure accurate fee collection.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 0247 appears to be mixed among stakeholders. Proponents of the bill view it as a necessary step toward strengthening environmental protections and ensuring responsible waste management. They argue that generating funding through this fee structure will empower local governments to better address the consequences of hazardous waste disposal. Conversely, critics have raised concerns about the potential financial burden on waste-producing entities and the effectiveness of using fees as a means of regulating waste disposal practices.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the specifics of the fee structure and how it may affect businesses that rely on these disposal wells. Some stakeholders express apprehension that the fees will disproportionately impact smaller entities that may struggle with compliance costs. Additionally, there is debate around the implementation measures and enforcement actions, especially regarding the accuracy of waste exemption certifications. This suggests ongoing discussions about balancing regulatory requirements with economic viability for businesses involved in hazardous waste management.