Michigan Senate Bill SB0213

Michigan 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/17/25
• Refer: 4/17/25
• Report Pass: 5/8/25
• Refer: 5/8/25
• Report Pass: 12/3/25
• Engrossed: 12/10/25
• Refer: 12/10/25

Caption

Economic development: other; strategic advisory board; create, and provide for the development of strategic plans. Amends title of 1984 PA 270 (MCL 125.2001 - 125.2094) & adds sec. 9c. TIE BAR WITH: SB 0214'25

Impact

The proposed changes in SB 213 include the creation of specific goals and objectives focused on enhancing economic opportunities. The strategic plan developed by the advisory board is expected to include quantifiable metrics assessing Michigan's progress in areas such as population growth, the quality of life, and the vitality of essential sectors like agriculture, forestry, and tourism. By establishing clear performance measures, the bill is intended to facilitate informed decision-making and foster accountability in implementing economic strategies.

Summary

Senate Bill 213 aims to amend the Michigan Strategic Fund Act by introducing a strategic advisory board tasked with formulating a comprehensive 10-year strategic plan for economic development in Michigan. The bill seeks to transfer the rights and responsibilities of the job development authority and the Michigan economic development authority to the Michigan Strategic Fund. This is intended to streamline economic development operations, ensuring that resources are more effectively allocated to foster growth and improve the living conditions of residents throughout the state.

Sentiment

Generally, discussions surrounding SB 213 have highlighted a supportive sentiment towards enhancing Michigan's economic framework. Proponents advocate that this bill represents a proactive approach to addressing the state's economic challenges and harnessing opportunities systematically. However, some stakeholders have raised concerns regarding the feasibility of implementing such a comprehensive plan and the potential bureaucratic hurdles that could arise from the establishment of a new board and its responsibilities.

Contention

Notably, the bill has raised discussions around the balance of power between state and local governance in economic development. Critics fear that consolidating authority within the Michigan Strategic Fund could limit local government autonomy to tailor economic strategies to their unique needs. This tension reflects broader debates on how to effectively manage economic development while considering the diverse needs of urban, suburban, and rural communities across Michigan.