Michigan House Bill HB5664

Michigan 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/4/26
• Refer: 3/4/26

Caption

Environmental protection: air pollution; carbon dioxide capture technology; provide for. Amends secs. 5501, 5530 & 5531 of 1994 PA 451 (MCL 324.5501 et seq.) & adds secs. 5505c, 5505e, 5505g & 5505i. TIE BAR WITH: HB 5665'26, HB 5666'26, HB 5667'26, HB 5668'26, HB 5669'26

Impact

If enacted, HB 5664 would have significant implications for state environmental regulations. By mandating that carbon dioxide capture projects meet a minimum capture rate of 90% and undergo rigorous assessment processes, the bill aims to enhance the state's capability to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions. It also establishes reporting obligations that would require the department to evaluate the progress and effectiveness of carbon dioxide capture initiatives regularly. This measure ensures that the state aligns its environmental goals with broader initiatives targeting climate change mitigation.

Summary

House Bill 5664 is a legislative initiative aimed at amending the Natural Resources and Environmental Protection Act to address air pollution and promote carbon dioxide capture technologies in Michigan. The bill introduces amendments to existing definitions and sections related to air contamination and pollution, specifically focusing on the establishment of carbon dioxide capture projects. This legislation emphasizes that any project aiming to capture carbon dioxide from ambient air or industrial sources must adhere to specific compliance standards and reporting requirements set by the state Department of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy.

Contention

Notably, the bill has sparked discussions surrounding regulatory compliance and the potential financial implications for industries subject to these new requirements. Critics may argue that the financial burden of upgrading facilities to meet the stringent capture rate could disproportionately affect smaller entities. Furthermore, the potential impacts on environmental justice communities have led to calls for additional safeguards to ensure that the implementation of carbon capture does not exacerbate existing inequities. Provisions for public comment and engagement indicate a recognition of these concerns, although the exact mechanisms and outcomes remain to be seen.