Michigan House Bill HB4924

Michigan 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 9/11/25
• Refer: 9/11/25

Caption

Occupations: individual licensing and registration; licensing reciprocity under the occupational code for certain individuals who hold an out-of-state license; provide for. Amends sec. 217 of 1980 PA 299 (MCL 339.217).

Impact

The introduction of HB 4924 is intended to make it easier for those with military affiliations to practice their professions in Michigan by reducing the bureaucratic hurdles often associated with licensure. By facilitating licensure reciprocity, the bill aims to not only support veterans but also to alleviate workforce shortages in various sectors by making skilled professionals more accessible to employers. This could have a positive economic impact by enabling veterans and military spouses to quickly enter the job market, enhancing the overall quality of the workforce within the state.

Summary

House Bill 4924 seeks to amend the Michigan Occupational Code concerning the issuance of professional licenses and certificates of registration. The bill mandates that individuals who are members of the armed forces, veterans, or dependents of these individuals can receive licenses without the necessity of examination if they meet certain criteria. Specifically, applicants must hold a valid license from another state, which has been in good standing for at least one year, and must fulfill the educational and experience requirements established by that state. This provision aims to streamline the licensing process for military families, recognizing their unique circumstances and mobility needs.

Contention

Despite its intended positive impacts, HB 4924 could raise concerns regarding the standards of professional practice in Michigan. Opponents may argue that such measures, while beneficial to veterans, could lead to a dilution of licensing standards if not carefully regulated. There are worries that allowing individuals to bypass examinations may compromise the quality of services provided to the public. The debate may center on finding a balance between facilitating access to employment for veterans and ensuring that professional standards remain high to protect consumers.