Michigan House Bill HB4905

Michigan 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 9/11/25
• Refer: 9/11/25

Caption

Health occupations: counselors; virtual supervision to earn marriage and family therapy licensing; provide for. Amends sec. 16909 of 1978 PA 368 (MCL 333.16909).

Impact

The amendments in HB4905 are designed to enhance the quality of marriage and family therapy practice by tightening entry requirements. By detailing both the educational prerequisites and the necessary supervised clinical experience, the bill aims to ensure that licensed professionals are well-trained. Such measures are intended to foster a higher standard of therapy practice which could lead to better mental health outcomes for clients. This will likely result in stricter licensing regulations for prospective therapists, making it more difficult for unqualified individuals to enter the field.

Summary

House Bill 4905 is proposed legislation that seeks to amend 1978 PA 368, specifically focusing on the licensing requirements for marriage and family therapists in Michigan. The bill outlines the educational qualifications necessary for obtaining a license, such as having a master's or higher graduate degree from an accredited training program in marriage and family therapy. It also specifies required coursework in various relevant subjects like family studies, therapy methodology, and ethics. Moreover, the bill establishes clinical experience standards, mandating that aspiring therapists complete supervised clinical hours to ensure they are adequately prepared for their roles.

Contention

However, some concerns have been raised about the implications of these changes. Stakeholders may argue that these stricter requirements could inadvertently limit access to therapy services, particularly in underserved areas where qualified therapists are already scarce. Additionally, the requirements related to direct client contact hours and supervision ratios may disproportionately affect smaller practices or new therapists trying to establish themselves in the field. Critics might contend that the focus on extensive supervised experience could delay the entry of new professionals into the workforce, potentially exacerbating the existing mental health service gaps in certain communities.