Michigan House Bill HB4473

Michigan 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 5/8/25
• Refer: 5/8/25

Caption

State: identification cards; real ID-compliant official state personal identification cards; prohibit the secretary of state from issuing. Amends sec. 1 of 1972 PA 222 (MCL 28.291).

Impact

A significant aspect of HB4473 is its intention to enhance the security of the identification process. It is designed to prevent identity fraud by requiring stringent verification procedures for personal identification cards. Additionally, the bill specifies that the Secretary of State must not issue any identification card that complies with Title II of the Real ID Act of 2005, reiterating the state's autonomous stance on identity regulations. This measure could impact interactions between non-citizens and law enforcement agencies, promoting clearer identification protocols.

Summary

House Bill 4473 proposes an amendment to the 1972 PA 222, which governs the issuance and regulation of personal identification cards in Michigan. The bill ensures that individuals residing in the state, including non-citizens, may apply for an official state personal identification card. It mandates the submission of various identity documents to verify the applicant’s identity and citizenship status. Furthermore, it delineates rules for applicants who are not U.S. citizens, requiring them to present documentation that substantiates their legal presence in the country.

Contention

Despite the intended benefits, the bill may face contention regarding its implications for non-citizen residents. Critics may argue that the requirements imposed on non-citizens could create barriers to obtaining necessary identification, potentially disenfranchising those who are eligible but unable to navigate the complex documentation process. Moreover, there are concerns surrounding privacy parameters, especially regarding the handling and disclosure of Social Security numbers and other sensitive information. The balance between security and accessibility remains a contested point in the legislative discourse surrounding HB4473.