Michigan House Bill HB4309

Michigan 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/27/25
• Refer: 3/27/25
• Report Pass: 4/23/25
• Report Pass: 5/8/25
• Engrossed: 5/13/25
• Refer: 5/15/25
• Report Pass: 11/13/25
• Refer: 11/13/25
• Refer: 11/12/25

Caption

Health occupations: physician's assistants; physician's assistants licensure compact; provide for. Amends sec. 18001 of 1978 PA 368 (MCL 333.18001) & adds secs. 16188, 17011b, 17511b & 18011b.

Impact

By joining the PA Licensure Compact, Michigan aims to streamline the licensing process for PAs, enabling easier access to healthcare for residents, especially in underserved areas. The bill is expected to not only benefit patients but also support military families, as active duty military personnel and their spouses will be able to acquire compact privileges based on their existing licenses. This move aligns with efforts to improve healthcare delivery systems across state lines and adapt to modern demands in medical services.

Summary

House Bill 4309 introduces the PA Licensure Compact into Michigan law, facilitating the practice of physician assistants (PAs) across state lines. This bill amends the 1978 Public Health Code, specifically addressing the licensing and regulations governing PAs. The Compact allows PAs licensed in one participating state to practice in other member states without needing to obtain additional licenses, thus enhancing the accessibility of medical services in Michigan and reducing administrative hurdles for PAs relocating from one state to another.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding HB 4309 appears to be positive among healthcare stakeholders and policymakers, who recognize the necessity of adapting licensing laws to contemporary needs. Supporters argue that this will improve healthcare accessibility and convenience. However, it may face scrutiny from those concerned about ensuring that all PAs meet rigorous state standards, which may vary across states, creating debates on quality and safety in medical practice.

Contention

Some points of contention may arise regarding the balance between state-level regulatory authority and the need for a unified approach to PA licensing. Critics could argue that while the compact enhances mobility for PAs, it might compromise local standards and accountability. Discussions in legislative committees may involve ensuring that the state continues to maintain comprehensive oversight of PAs’ qualifications and practices, addressing public safety concerns amidst the push for more accessible healthcare options.