Michigan House Bill HB4189

Michigan 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/6/25
• Refer: 3/6/25
• Report Pass: 4/30/25
• Engrossed: 6/4/25
• Refer: 6/10/25
• Report Pass: 12/4/25
• Refer: 12/4/25

Caption

Highways: memorial; bridge over highway I-96; designate as the "LCpl Michael W. Hanks Memorial Bridge". Amends 2001 PA 142 (MCL 250.1001 - 250.2092) by adding sec. 1051.

Impact

The bill's enactment will result in a formal designation of the bridge, enhancing its visibility and significance as a memorial site. Signage will be managed by the state transportation department in coordination with the Livingston County road commission, indicating a collaborative approach to memorializing local heroes within the state's highway system. This change not only affects the local community’s recognition of its history but also serves as a potential educational point for travelers and residents, reiterating the importance of honoring veterans.

Summary

House Bill 4189 seeks to honor LCpl Michael W. Hanks by designating the bridge on South Grand Avenue over highway I-96 in the village of Fowlerville as the 'LCpl Michael W. Hanks Memorial Bridge.' This bill amends the Michigan Memorial Highway Act, specifically adding a new section to formally recognize the bridge and ensure appropriate signage is placed at its approaches. The intent is to commemorate the life and service of Corporal Hanks, further integrating memorial tributes within Michigan's infrastructure.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 4189 appears to be overwhelmingly positive, as it focuses on honoring a service member. There is likely broad support among legislators as memorial bills typically unite communities in remembrance. Additionally, such designations are often met with community pride and respect, fostering a sense of local identity and heritage. The non-controversial nature of the bill also suggests that it should move smoothly through the legislative process without significant opposition.

Contention

Given the nature and purpose of HB 4189, there does not seem to be notable contention surrounding the bill. Memorial designations usually garner support across political lines, focusing on collective respect for service members and their sacrifices. As such, the primary discussions likely revolve around logistics, such as the placement of signage and costs incurred by the state, rather than any ideological disagreement.