Maryland 2026 Regular Session

Maryland House Bill HB381

Introduced
1/21/26  

Caption

State Highway Administration - Urban Core and Urban Center Traffic Control Devices - No Turn on Red

Impact

The legislation is expected to significantly impact existing traffic laws and safety measures on state highways in urban environments. By centralizing the regulation of traffic control devices, the bill aims to improve overall road safety, particularly in densely populated areas. This may entail reevaluating current traffic patterns and signals at various intersections. However, it also raises questions about the logistical challenges and financial implications of installing these devices across multiple locations under the jurisdiction of the State Highway Administration.

Summary

House Bill 381 addresses traffic regulation in urban areas by mandating the installation of traffic control devices that prohibit right turns on red signals at intersections on state highways within urban cores and urban centers. The bill aims to enhance safety for pedestrians and cyclists by reducing potential conflicts at intersections. The State Highway Administration is tasked with the implementation of this requirement, notably by July 1, 2029, ensuring uniformity in traffic rules within these designated areas.

Contention

Key points of contention surrounding HB 381 involve concerns about the practicality of enforcing no turn on red regulations, particularly in busy urban settings where traffic flow is crucial. Critics argue that such restrictions might lead to increased congestion and longer wait times at traffic signals, potentially inconveniencing drivers. Additionally, there is discussion on whether exceptions should be built into the bill; it currently allows the State Highway Administration the discretion to forgo the installation of these devices if they determine it could impair public safety.

Effectiveness

If successfully implemented, HB 381 could lead to a notable shift in how traffic is managed in urban areas, enhancing the safety of vulnerable road users and possibly leading to a decrease in traffic-related incidents. However, the effectiveness of the bill will largely depend on the installation process, public compliance, and the ability of traffic management systems to adapt to these changes without disrupting traffic flow.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

MD HB780

Urban State Highways - Speed Limits - Exemptions

MD SB424

Urban State Highways - Speed Limits - Exceptions

MD HB1130

State Highway Administration - Maryland Route 410 (East-West Highway) Pedestrian Safety Action Plan - Expansion

MD HB759

Baltimore County - Speed Monitoring Systems - Funding for Traffic Calming Devices

MD HB1173

State Procurement - Contractors and Vendors - Restrictions on Use of State Funds and Resources

MD HB963

Montgomery County - Highways - Maximum Speed Limits MC 1-25

MD SB193

State Highway Administration - Memorials - Maryland Route 210 in Prince George's County

MD HB1508

State Highways - Highway Work Permits - Notice

MD HB440

State Highway Administration - Memorials - Maryland Route 210 in Prince George's County PG 307-25

MD HB628

Highways - Sidewalks and Bicycle Pathways - Construction and Reconstruction

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.