Maryland 2026 Regular Session

Maryland House Bill HB329

Introduced
1/16/26  
Refer
1/16/26  
Report Pass
3/13/26  
Engrossed
3/18/26  
Refer
3/19/26  
Report Pass
4/8/26  

Caption

Criminal Law - School Resource Officers - Prohibition on Sexual Activity with Students

Impact

If enacted, HB 329 will amend existing Maryland law to explicitly include students in the list of individuals with whom law enforcement officers cannot engage in sexual activity while serving in an official capacity. This amendment addresses a significant gap in the current law, reinforcing the prohibition against such relationships and thereby aiming to bolster student safety and uphold the integrity of the educational environment. Furthermore, the bill categorizes violations as misdemeanors punishable by imprisonment or fines, reflecting a serious approach to deterring potential abuse of power by school resource officers.

Summary

House Bill 329, titled 'Criminal Law – School Resource Officers – Prohibition on Sexual Activity with Students', aims to establish a clear legal framework prohibiting law enforcement officers from engaging in sexual acts with students enrolled in the schools where they serve as school resource officers. The bill expands the legal definitions under which inappropriate relationships with students are considered a violation of law enforcement conduct, specifically adding students as a protected class against such misconduct. This bill comes in response to the growing concerns regarding the safeguarding of students and ensuring their protection within educational environments.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 329 appears to be generally positive among advocates for student protection and education reform. Stakeholders within educational and child advocacy communities have expressed strong support for the bill, highlighting its importance in safeguarding students from potential exploitation. However, there may be some concerns regarding the enforcement of such laws and the implications for school resource officers, depending on their assigned roles and community trust in law enforcement may come into play during discussions.

Contention

A notable point of contention may arise around the balance of authority between law enforcement and educational institutions. While the bill is aimed at preventing misconduct, discussions could touch upon the potential impacts on the recruitment and retention of school resource officers who play crucial roles in maintaining safety within schools. Additionally, there may be debates regarding the adequacy of existing investigations and consequences for violations that occur, with some advocating for more comprehensive reforms rather than piecemeal legislative changes.

Companion Bills

MD SB81

Crossfiled Criminal Law - School Resource Officers - Prohibition on Sexual Activity with Students

Previously Filed As

MD SB889

Criminal Law - Distribution of Students' Personal Information - Prohibition

MD SB644

Public Schools - School Resource Officers - Firearms Required

MD SB545

Criminal Law - Child Pornography - Prohibitions and Penalties

MD HB364

Criminal Law - Child Pornography - Prohibitions and Penalties

MD HB305

Criminal Law - Interference With Access to or Egress From a Religious Facility - Prohibition

MD SB287

Criminal Law - Interference With Access to or Egress From a Religious Facility - Prohibition

MD SB122

Criminal Law - Hate Crimes - Law Enforcement Officers

MD HB260

Criminal Law - Drug Paraphernalia - Prohibitions and Penalties

MD HB5

Criminal Law - Child Sexual Abuse Material - Artificial Intelligence Software

MD SB616

Criminal Law – Human Remains, Pet Remains, and Cemeteries – Prohibitions

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.