Provides relative to high-dosage tutoring. (gov sig) (EG +$15,200,000 GF EX See Note)
Impact
The bill requires local school boards to prioritize placements in classrooms with highly effective or exemplary teachers for students needing additional support. Furthermore, high-dosage tutoring must commence within 30 days of identification. This will likely impact teaching practices, resource allocation, and potentially the academic outcomes for many students throughout the state. Education stakeholders may need to adjust existing protocols to meet the new standards for instructor qualifications and tutoring timelines.
Summary
Senate Bill 27 seeks to enhance academic support by broadening the criteria for students eligible for expanded academic programs. Under current law, expanded support is available only for students in grades K-5 who fail to achieve mastery on statewide assessments in reading or math. SB27 expands this to cover grades K-8 and includes additional criteria related to English language arts and numeracy. This extension reflects an effort to address the educational needs of students beyond the early grades, which can be crucial for overall academic success.
Sentiment
Overall, sentiment regarding SB27 appears to be positive, particularly among proponents of educational reform who view enhanced support as essential for addressing achievement gaps in schools. However, there may be concerns regarding the practical implementation of such measures, particularly related to the availability of qualified teachers and tutors. Critics may argue about the costs associated with expanded tutoring programs and whether sufficient resources can be provided to meet the new demands placed on schools.
Contention
While the goals of SB27 are largely supported, potential points of contention include how schools will manage the increased expectations for timely tutoring interventions and the verification of tutor qualifications. Additionally, there may be debates regarding the appropriateness of high-dosage tutoring methods and their effectiveness in improving student outcomes. The bill’s amendments to reporting requirements for local school boards could also lead to disagreements on data accuracy and accountability measures.
Provides relative to the use of seclusion and physical restraint to address the behavior of students with exceptionalities (OR INCREASE GF EX See Note)