Kansas 2025-2026 Regular Session

Kansas Senate Bill SB348

Introduced
1/21/26  
Refer
1/21/26  
Report Pass
1/27/26  
Engrossed
2/9/26  
Refer
2/9/26  
Report Pass
2/25/26  
Enrolled
3/6/26  

Caption

Exempting any electric public utility that is a not-for-profit wholly owned subsidiary of an electric cooperative public utility from the jurisdiction of the state corporation commission.

Impact

The potential impact of SB348 is notable as it could lead to a reduction in regulatory burdens on not-for-profit electric utilities. By exempting these entities from state oversight, the bill encourages the proliferation of cooperative-owned utilities, which may operate with more flexibility. Proponents argue that this could foster innovation and lower costs for consumers, as cooperatives typically focus on community-oriented service rather than profit maximization. Conversely, critics express concerns about a lack of accountability and oversight, fearing that the absence of state reviews could lead to subpar service and operational inefficiencies.

Summary

SB348 seeks to exempt any electric public utility that is a not-for-profit wholly owned subsidiary of an electric cooperative public utility from the jurisdiction of the state corporation commission. This exemption implies that such entities would no longer be subject to certain regulatory oversight traditionally held by the commission, affecting how these utilities operate within the state. The bill presents a significant shift in the regulatory landscape for utilities, particularly those aligning with the not-for-profit model.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding SB348 revolve around the balance of regulatory authority and the protection of consumer interests. Supporters believe that the bill empowers local cooperatives to better serve their communities, while opponents argue that it undermines essential consumer protections that exist through state regulation. The discussion reflects a broader debate on the role of public utilities and the need for sufficient oversight versus the desire for deregulation in certain sectors of the economy. As the bill moves through the legislative process, these tensions highlight the different perspectives on how best to manage public utilities in the state.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

TX SB1856

Relating to a capacity cost recovery rider for certain electric utilities.

NJ A4505

Requires BPU to establish best practices and to assess electric public utilities' compliance with BPU best practices during BPU's review of rate increase.

NJ S3843

Requires BPU to establish best practices and to assess electric public utilities' compliance with BPU best practices during BPU's review of rate increase.

TX HB2868

Relating to the consideration of the proportion of long-term debt and equity capitalization in establishing the rates of certain electric utilities.

TX HB3230

Relating to a capacity cost recovery rider for certain electric utilities.

NJ S3373

Requires BPU to publish plain language summary of its final decision on rate increase filings.

NJ A4502

Requires BPU to publish plain language summary of its final decision on rate increase filings.

TX HB222

Relating to the management and removal of vegetation and debris by certain electric utilities.