Indiana House Bill HCR0001

Indiana 2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 12/4/25
• Report Pass: 1/8/26
• Engrossed: 1/13/26
• Refer: 1/13/26
• Report Pass: 2/3/26
• Enrolled: 2/6/26
• Passed: 2/6/26

Caption

Urging the Indiana Department of Transportation to rename the U.S. 41 bridge over the Kankakee River the "Corporal Brandon Schreiber Memorial Bridge".

Impact

The resolution, while not a bill of law, sets a precedent for honoring fallen law enforcement officers in Indiana through memorials. By urging the Indiana Department of Transportation to undertake this action, the resolution aims to ensure that Schreiber's contributions and sacrifice to the community are formally recognized. It could potentially lead to further initiatives that honor other law enforcement personnel who have lost their lives in service, fostering a culture of remembrance and respect.

Summary

HCR0001 is a House Concurrent Resolution urging the Indiana Department of Transportation to rename the U.S. 41 bridge over the Kankakee River as the 'Corporal Brandon Schreiber Memorial Bridge'. The resolution seeks to honor Corporal Schreiber, who tragically died in the line of duty following a vehicle pursuit incident. The resolution highlights key moments of Schreiber's life, including his service with the Newton County Sheriff's Department and his legacy as a devoted family man and community protector.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HCR0001 is largely positive, reflecting a community's desire to honor a fallen officer. The unanimous votes in both the House and Senate committees indicate strong bipartisan support for the resolution. Such gestures of remembrance are vital in upholding the memory of those who dedicate their lives to public service.

Contention

While the resolution has garnered favorable legislative support, there may be underlying discussions around the implications of such memorials. Some stakeholders might question the prioritization of specific memorials over others or debate the appropriateness of naming infrastructure after individuals in law enforcement. However, in this instance, no significant opposition appears to be documented in the voting records or discussions.