Indiana 2026 Regular Session

Indiana House Bill HB1019

Introduced
12/1/25  
Refer
12/1/25  
Refer
12/5/25  
Report Pass
1/8/26  
Engrossed
1/14/26  
Refer
1/27/26  
Report Pass
2/12/26  
Enrolled
2/18/26  
Passed
2/24/26  
Chaptered
2/24/26  

Caption

Constitutional amendment ballot question.

Impact

The primary impact of HB 1019 is the alteration of existing residency requirements for judges serving in city and town courts. By expanding the residential jurisdiction for these judges, the bill intends to provide greater flexibility, which advocates argue could enhance the judicial system by allowing qualified candidates who may not currently reside in the same city or town the opportunity to serve as judges. This change could streamline judicial appointments and potentially improve the quality of local justice administration.

Summary

House Bill 1019 addresses a proposed amendment to the Constitution of the State of Indiana regarding the residency requirements for city or town court judges. Under this bill, a judge would be permitted to reside either in the county where the court is located or in a bordering county closest to that city or town. This amendment will be presented to Indiana voters during the general election scheduled for 2026, as mandated by state law concerning constitutional amendments.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 1019 appears predominantly favorable, especially among those who support increased flexibility in local governance and judicial appointments. Legislators advocating for the bill suggest that it reflects modern realities and needs in the judicial landscape of Indiana. On the other hand, potential concerns may arise regarding the implications for local representation and the familiarity of judges with their communities, which could spark discussions among voters as they prepare to vote on this amendment.

Contention

While there are not significant points of contention highlighted in the current discussions, possible opposition might stem from concerns that non-resident judges could be less attuned to the specific needs and dynamics of the communities they serve. Critics may argue that local judges should be part of the community to ensure that they understand local issues, values, and expectations better. This sentiment could influence public opinion and the outcome of the vote during the general election.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

IN SB0299

Local public questions.

IN HB1681

Local public questions.

IN SB0302

Absentee ballots.

IN SB0186

Oath of ballot counter.

IN SB0532

Ballot tracking commission.

IN HB1657

Second amendment protection.

IN SB0526

Absentee ballot retraction.

IN HB1365

Ballot access for major and minor parties.

IN HB1633

Study of election issues.

IN HB1144

Courts.

Similar Bills

LA HB472

(Constitutional Amendment) Revises Article VII of the Constitution of La. (OR -$139,000,000 GF RV See Note)

NJ ACR123

Proposes temporary constitutional amendment allowing State constitutional convention convened to reform system of property taxation to propose statutory changes.

NJ SCR75

Proposes temporary constitutional amendment allowing State constitutional convention convened to reform system of property taxation to propose statutory changes.

NJ SCR43

Proposes constitutional amendment authorizing Legislature to invalidate certain court decisions.

LA HB244

(Constitutional Amendment) Provides for the election of constitutional convention delegates and vote requirements necessary for the adoption of a new constitution (RR SEE FISC NOTE GF EX)

LA HB678

(Constitutional Amendment) Modifies disposition of certain state revenues through repeal of the Revenue Stabilization Trust Fund and deposits of certain revenue streams into the Budget Stabilization Fund (RRF INCREASE GF RV See Note)

LA HB473

(Constitutional Amendment) Provides relative to the application of state monies to the unfunded accrued liability of the Teachers' Retirement System of La. (EN DECREASE SD RV See Note)

HI SB1225

Proposing An Amendment To Article Xvii, Section 3 Of The Hawaii Constitution To Specify That The Standard For Voter Approval Of A Constitutional Amendment Proposed By The Legislature Is A Majority Of All The Votes Tallied Upon The Question.