Iowa House Bill HF2413

Iowa 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/11/26
• Refer: 2/11/26

Caption

A bill for an act relating to executive branch functions, including ratification of major administrative rules and certain other actions, other matters relating to the state rulemaking process, and terms of service of certain appointed members of certain boards, and including applicability provisions.(See HF 2717.)

Impact

The implementation of HF 2413 would centralize certain regulatory powers within state government, particularly by allowing the legislature to have definitive control over major rules that could potentially affect economic conditions, safety regulations, and industry standards. Supporters of the bill argue that this will enhance accountability and provide an opportunity for greater public and legislative scrutiny over significant regulations. However, critics voice concerns that it may slow down the regulatory process and inhibit timely responses to pressing issues, especially during periods of emergencies when swift regulatory actions might be necessary.

Summary

House File 2413 focuses on the executive branch functions related to the ratification of major administrative rules in Iowa. The bill defines a 'major rule' as any rule that incurs annual expenditures of at least $200,000 or collective expenditures reaching $1 million over five years, significantly affects employment or competition, or amends the state implementation plan under the Clean Air Act. The bill mandates that major rules must receive ratification from the general assembly before taking effect, a process which entails approval by both the legislative council and the governor during the general assembly's session or via an emergency provision when the assembly is out of session.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding HF 2413 include the tension between the need for effective governance and the desire to maintain local and executive autonomy in rulemaking processes. Some argue that the requirement for legislative ratification of major rules could lead to political gridlocks and limit the ability of agencies to respond effectively to federal requirements or state emergencies. This provision could particularly impact areas like environmental regulations, public health, and safety, which often require quicker, decisive actions that might not align with legislative schedules.