Hawaii Senate Bill SCR89

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/16/26
• Refer: 3/19/26
• Report Pass: 4/6/26
• Engrossed: 4/7/26
• Refer: 4/10/26
• Report Pass: 4/17/26
• Refer: 4/17/26
• Report Pass: 4/24/26
• Passed: 4/27/26

Caption

Requesting The Hawaii Correctional System Oversight Commission To Establish An Advisory Committee To Develop Recommendations On The Implementation Of Alternative Models For Rehabilitation And Restorative Justice On Oahu.

Impact

If enacted, SCR89 intends to influence the planning and design of the new OCCC by advancing a framework that includes a trauma-informed approach and emphasizes community connections. It aims to facilitate a prison environment that is culturally appropriate and focuses on health and wellness in preparing individuals for reintegration into society. This bill reflects the growing recognition of the need for reform in the correctional systems toward more rehabilitative and restorative methodologies, as opposed to punitive approaches.

Summary

SCR89 is a Senate Concurrent Resolution introduced in the 2026 legislative session of Hawaii, which requests the Hawaii Correctional System Oversight Commission to establish an advisory committee. The purpose of this committee is to develop recommendations for implementing alternative models of rehabilitation and restorative justice, specifically on Oʻahu. This resolution arises from continued advocacy for a rehabilitative model for replacing the Oahu Community Correctional Center (OCCC) with a more effective and humane facility. The committee is expected to incorporate findings from the Breaking Cycles Study, which emphasizes principles rooted in Native Hawaiian culture and community engagement.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SCR89 is largely supportive, particularly among advocates for criminal justice reform and those emphasizing Native Hawaiian cultural values. Proponents argue that the bill reflects a necessary shift in how society approaches rehabilitation and addresses the root causes of criminal behavior. Meanwhile, critics of the broader correctional system may view this resolution as a small step in a much-needed transformation, emphasizing that effective implementation is critical to achieving meaningful outcomes.

Contention

Notable points of contention include varying opinions on the adequacy of existing rehabilitation programs and whether new models will genuinely reduce recidivism. There are concerns regarding the logistical and financial aspects of implementing the recommendations from the committee. Additionally, the level of community involvement and potential representation on the advisory committee from various stakeholders, including those with lived experience of incarceration, will be central to the resolution's success in addressing systemic issues within the correctional system.