Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

Hawaii Senate Bill SB3248

Introduced
1/28/26  
Refer
2/2/26  
Report Pass
2/19/26  
Refer
2/19/26  
Report Pass
3/5/26  
Engrossed
3/10/26  
Refer
3/12/26  
Report Pass
3/24/26  
Refer
3/24/26  

Caption

Relating To Labeling Requirements.

Impact

The passage of SB3248 will amend Chapter 486 of the Hawaii Revised Statutes, thereby instituting specific labeling requirements for any product claiming to contain ʻōkolehao. Distilled spirits must meet certain criteria, including originating from at least 51% kī grown in Hawaiʻi, which could foster a more robust local agricultural economy. By ensuring that only compliant products can be labeled as ʻōkolehao, the state aims to protect this cultural product and enhance its market value both locally and nationally. This is aligned with efforts promote Hawaiian agricultural efforts and cultural heritage.

Summary

SB3248 aims to establish labeling requirements for ʻōkolehao, a traditional Hawaiian distilled spirit. The bill recognizes the cultural and historical significance of ʻōkolehao, which is produced using kī (ti plant) and has deep ties to Native Hawaiian society. The legislation intends to protect the integrity of the product by preventing misuse of the ʻōkolehao name, which has been diluted over time due to a lack of clear standards. The establishment of labeling requirements aims to bolster consumer confidence and support local farmers by promoting authenticity in labeling practices.

Sentiment

General sentiment around SB3248 appears positive, particularly from those who advocate for the preservation of Hawaiian culture and agriculture. Lawmakers and cultural leaders expressed favorable views, seeing this legislation as a much-needed step to restore and protect a piece of Hawaiʻi’s identity. Additionally, the anticipated economic benefits from increased tourism and support for local agriculture have garnered support from various stakeholders. However, there may be concerns regarding the implementation of the labeling standards and the capacity of local producers to meet these requirements.

Contention

Debates regarding SB3248 also highlight potential contention between the desire to regulate and protect local products and the practical implications for producers. Some may argue that stringent labeling requirements could impose burdens on smaller distilleries that may struggle to meet the new standards. The bill's proponents, however, emphasize that clear definitions and authentic branding, akin to what has been successfully done for products like tequila and bourbon, can ultimately lead to greater economic outcomes for the community and a stronger visitor economy.

Companion Bills

HI HB2475

Same As Relating To Labeling Requirements.

Previously Filed As

HI HB534

Relating To Labeling Requirements.

HI SB129

Relating To Labeling Requirements.

HI HB48

Relating To Coffee Labeling.

HI SB500

Relating To Coffee Labeling.

HI HB918

Relating To Labeling.

HI SB135

Relating To The Labeling Of Macadamia Nuts.

HI HB530

Relating To The Labeling Of Macadamia Nuts.

HI HB108

Relating To Intoxicating Liquor.

HI SB614

Relating To Hawaiian Independence Day.

HI HB939

Relating To Alcohol.

Similar Bills

HI HB2475

Relating To Labeling Requirements.

CA ACA2

Legislature: retirement.

CA SB699

Legislature: constitutional course.

MI HR0041

A resolution to direct the Clerk of the House of Representatives to only present to the Governor enrolled House bills finally passed by both houses of the One Hundred Third Legislature.

TX HB1615

Relating to the nonsubstantive revision of certain local laws concerning water and wastewater special districts, including a conforming amendment.

AK SCR1

Art. Ii, Sec. 16, Const: Veto Recon