Hawaii Senate Bill SB3225

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/28/26
• Refer: 2/2/26
• Report Pass: 3/6/26
• Engrossed: 3/10/26
• Refer: 3/12/26
• Report Pass: 3/30/26
• Enrolled: 4/1/26
• Chaptered: 4/14/26
• Passed: 4/14/26

Caption

A Bill For An Act Relating To Statutory Revision: Amending Or Repealing Various Provisions Of The Hawaii Revised Statutes Or The Session Laws Of Hawaii For The Purposes Of Correcting Errors And References, Clarifying Language, Or Deleting Obsolete Or Unnecessary Provisions.

Impact

The enactment of SB3225 is likely to streamline statutory language and reduce ambiguities that may currently exist in the Hawaii Revised Statutes. By eliminating outdated references and correcting errors, the bill aims to make the statutes easier to navigate for legal practitioners, lawmakers, and citizens alike. This may also enhance the efficiency of legal proceedings and administrative functions, thereby fostering a more responsive legal environment. Overall, the revisions could improve the effectiveness of legislative measures implemented in Hawaii.

Summary

SB3225 is a legislative act aimed at amending or repealing various provisions of the Hawaii Revised Statutes and the session laws of Hawaii. The primary intent of the bill is to correct errors, clarify language, and delete obsolete or unnecessary provisions within the existing legal framework. By addressing these outdated elements, the bill seeks to promote legal accuracy and ensure the statutes remain relevant and functional in the context of modern governance and public needs. This act is seen as a necessary update to facilitate better compliance and comprehension of state laws by the public and entities interacting with them.

Contention

While the bill is largely procedural and technical in nature, potential points of contention may arise if specific provisions thought to be outdated or unnecessary are subjected to debate. Stakeholders, including legal experts, lawmakers, and advocacy groups, may have differing views on which provisions should be revised or repealed. There is always a concern about preserving the historical context and implications of certain laws that might appear obsolete but have legacy significance for particular communities or sectors.