Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

Hawaii Senate Bill SB3123

Introduced
1/28/26  
Refer
2/2/26  
Report Pass
2/25/26  
Engrossed
3/5/26  
Refer
3/10/26  
Report Pass
3/23/26  
Enrolled
3/24/26  
Chaptered
3/30/26  

Caption

Relating To Private Support Of Education.

Impact

The bill is expected to positively influence the landscape of private education in Hawaii. By establishing that conditional gifts do not create contractual liabilities, the legislation aims to promote greater financial support for private pre-schools and K-12 schools. This clarity serves to strengthen the relationship between donors and educational institutions, ultimately fostering a more robust private educational sector. Moreover, it is anticipated that this will enhance student access to private educational resources by encouraging philanthropic donations.

Summary

SB3123, relating to private support of education, aims to clarify the legal status of conditional educational gifts, such as scholarship awards. The bill stipulates that these gifts, which are intended to support private educational efforts, should be recognized as gifts rather than contractual obligations unless explicitly stated otherwise in writing between the donor and the recipient. This legislative measure encourages philanthropists to contribute to private educational institutions without the fear of their intentions being misunderstood or legal complexities arising regarding obligations tied to those gifts.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding SB3123 appears to be favorable among legislators and supporters of private education. Advocates argue that the bill represents a significant step in supporting educational philanthropy by alleviating concerns that potential donors might have regarding the contractual nature of educational gifts. However, there may also be underlying tensions with public education stakeholders who fear that increased private financial support could detract from funding opportunities for public schools.

Contention

Notable points of contention regarding this bill center around the implications of defining educational gifts strictly as conditional. Critics may argue that this could lead to inequities in funding, potentially favoring those who can afford to contribute to private institutions while neglecting public educational needs. Additionally, there may be concerns about how the stipulations regarding donor conditions could be interpreted or enforced, leading to possible disputes over eligibility criteria and standards of conduct.

Companion Bills

HI HB2304

Same As Relating To Private Support Of Education.

Previously Filed As

HI SB819

Relating To Education.

HI SB533

Relating To Education.

HI SB529

Relating To Education.

HI HB320

Relating To Supported Decision-making Agreements.

HI SB894

Relating To Education.

HI SB659

Relating To The Department Of Education.

HI SB1391

Relating To Education.

HI HB620

Relating To Education.

HI SB532

Relating To The Department Of Education.

HI HB91

Relating To Higher Education.

Similar Bills

CA ACA2

Legislature: retirement.

CA SB699

Legislature: constitutional course.

MI HR0041

A resolution to direct the Clerk of the House of Representatives to only present to the Governor enrolled House bills finally passed by both houses of the One Hundred Third Legislature.

TX HB1615

Relating to the nonsubstantive revision of certain local laws concerning water and wastewater special districts, including a conforming amendment.

AK SCR1

Art. Ii, Sec. 16, Const: Veto Recon

TX HB1620

Relating to nonsubstantive additions to, revisions of, and corrections in enacted codes, to the nonsubstantive codification or disposition of various laws omitted from enacted codes, and to conforming codifications enacted by the 88th Legislature to other Acts of that legislature.

CA AB26

Eliminate the Politicians’ Perks Act of 2025.

NJ S1701

Requires legislative approval of changes to core curriculum content standards and Statewide assessments.